These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20943036)

  • 1. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
    Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
    Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results.
    Davis DM; Packer ME
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
    Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study.
    Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The maintenance requirements of mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants using three different attachment mechanisms--balls, magnets, and bars; 3-year results.
    Davis DM; Packer ME
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Dec; 8(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 11692994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Wahab LA; Sadig W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified method for rebasing implant-retained overdentures.
    Polychronakis N; Sotiriou M; Zissis A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 20305854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
    Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Magnetic materials in dentistry].
    Espías Gómez AF; Alonso Pérez S
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1990 Nov; 6(9):533-4, 536-8, 540-2 passim. PubMed ID: 2076125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Viability of magnetic denture retainers: a 3-year case report.
    Thean HP; Khor SK; Loh PL
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 11495563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removable partial overdentures with mechanical (precision) attachments.
    Mensor MC
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Oct; 34(4):669-81. PubMed ID: 2227040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.