These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20943036)

  • 21. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
    Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnet overdentures.
    Gillings BR
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1993; 7():13-21. PubMed ID: 8695187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Magnetic denture retention systems: inexpensive and efficient.
    Gillings BR
    Int Dent J; 1984 Sep; 34(3):184-97. PubMed ID: 6384053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.
    Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient responses to dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture therapy: a 6-year clinical study.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Chang Gung Med J; 2007; 30(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 17939266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scanning electron microscopy observations of failures of implant overdenture bars: a case series report.
    Waddell JN; Payne AG; Swain MV; Kieser JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 20148915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-implant mandibular overdentures: simple to fabricate and easy to wear.
    Klemetti E; Chehade A; Takanashi Y; Feine JS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 12556267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments.
    Cheng T; Sun G; Huo J; He X; Wang Y; Ren YF
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):1018-23. PubMed ID: 22925922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The extent of maintenance required by implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year report.
    Davis DM; Rogers JO; Packer ME
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):767-74. PubMed ID: 8990639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures?
    Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective 2-year clinical evaluation of overdentures attached to nonsplinted implants utilizing ERA attachments.
    Landa LS; Cho SC; Froum SJ; Elian N; Tarnow DP
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):151-6; quiz 158. PubMed ID: 11315434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.