These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20943103)

  • 1. Replacement of resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth.
    Asghar S; Ali A; Rashid S; Hussain T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Oct; 20(10):639-43. PubMed ID: 20943103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 1437695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8700766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Placement and replacement of dental restorations.
    Mahmood S; Chohan AN; Al-Jannakh M; Al-Baker H; Smales RJ
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Oct; 14(10):589-92. PubMed ID: 15456546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps.
    York AK; Arthur JS
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 8152990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure.
    Kopperud SE; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Dec; 120(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 23167471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
    Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.