These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20943687)

  • 1. How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.
    Pruitt JN; Riechert SE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Apr; 278(1709):1209-15. PubMed ID: 20943687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent success of cheaters during foraging bouts might limit their spread within colonies of a socially polymorphic spider.
    Pruitt JN; Riechert SE
    Evolution; 2009 Nov; 63(11):2966-73. PubMed ID: 19619222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society.
    Wright CM; Holbrook CT; Pruitt JN
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9533-7. PubMed ID: 24979771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task specialization in two social spiders, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Eresidae) and Anelosimus eximius (Theridiidae).
    Settepani V; Grinsted L; Granfeldt J; Jensen JL; Bilde T
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 23163349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider.
    Pruitt JN; Riechert SE
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2011 May; 65(5):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 21625651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similar patterns of frequency-dependent selection on animal personalities emerge in three species of social spiders.
    Lichtenstein JL; Pruitt JN
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 25940218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prey size and scramble vs. contest competition in a social spider: implications for population dynamics.
    Sharpe RV; Avilés L
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Sep; 85(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 27300160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider.
    Grinsted L; Pruitt JN; Settepani V; Bilde T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Sep; 280(1767):20131407. PubMed ID: 23902907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioural traits of colony founders affect the life history of their colonies.
    Pruitt JN
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Sep; 15(9):1026-32. PubMed ID: 22731959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.
    Keiser CN; Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141424. PubMed ID: 25320170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size.
    Keiser CN; Wright CM; Pruitt JN
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():14-21. PubMed ID: 26205161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relatedness and genetic structure in a socially polymorphic population of the spider Anelosimus studiosus.
    Duncan SI; Riechert SE; Fitzpatrick BM; Fordyce JA
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Feb; 19(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 20074313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous.
    Pruitt JN; Oufiero CE; Avilés L; Riechert SE
    Am Nat; 2012 Oct; 180(4):496-510. PubMed ID: 22976012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraspecific trait variants determine the nature of interspecific interactions in a habitat-forming species.
    Pruitt JN; Ferrari MC
    Ecology; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1902-8. PubMed ID: 22073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A stochastic simulation model for Anelosimus studiosus during prey capture: a case study for determination of optimal spacing.
    Joyner ML; Ross CR; Watts C; Jones TC
    Math Biosci Eng; 2014 Dec; 11(6):1411-29. PubMed ID: 25365607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in group size and the extent of individual participation in group hunting may contribute to differential prey-size use among social spiders.
    Harwood G; Avilés L
    Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130621. PubMed ID: 24284559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Animal personality in a foundation species drives community divergence and collapse in the wild.
    Pruitt JN; Modlmeier AP
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Nov; 84(6):1461-8. PubMed ID: 26061961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participation in cooperative prey capture and the benefits gained from it are associated with individual personality.
    Lichtenstein JLL; Wright CM; Luscuskie LP; Montgomery GA; Pinter-Wollman N; Pruitt JN
    Curr Zool; 2017 Oct; 63(5):561-567. PubMed ID: 29033979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prey size, prey perishability and group foraging in a social spider.
    Rypstra AL; Tirey RS
    Oecologia; 1991 Mar; 86(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 28313153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the repeatability, robustness to disturbance, and parent-offspring colony resemblance of collective behavior.
    Fisher DN; Lichtenstein JLL; Costa-Pereira R; Yeager J; Pruitt JN
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Apr; 33(4):410-421. PubMed ID: 31821669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.