These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20944058)

  • 1. Ethical practice in sex offender assessment: consideration of actuarial and polygraph methods.
    Vess J
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Sep; 23(3):381-96. PubMed ID: 20944058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex offender polygraph examination: an evidence-based case management tool for social workers.
    Levenson JS
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2009 Oct; 6(4):361-75. PubMed ID: 20183683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex offender reentry courts: a cost effective proposal for managing sex offender risk in the community.
    La Fond JQ; Winick BJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():300-23; discussion 352-9. PubMed ID: 12839907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment.
    Kokish R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):175-94. PubMed ID: 15308451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of mandatory polygraph testing for sexual offenders in the United kingdom.
    Gannon TA; Wood JL; Pina A; Tyler N; Barnoux MF; Vasquez EA
    Sex Abuse; 2014 Apr; 26(2):178-203. PubMed ID: 23698742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A trial of voluntary polygraphy testing in 10 english probation areas.
    Grubin D
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Sep; 22(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 20713747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics and the treatment of sexual offenders.
    Mela M; Ahmed AG
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2014 Jun; 37(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 24877710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of sex offenders: lessons learned from the assessment of non-sex offenders.
    Serin RC; Mailloux DL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():185-97; discussion 236-46. PubMed ID: 12839898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective study of the impact of polygraphy on high-risk behaviors in adult sex offenders.
    Grubin D; Madsen L; Parsons S; Sosnowski D; Warberg B
    Sex Abuse; 2004 Jun; 16(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 15326881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The treatment of sex offenders: evidence, ethics, and human rights.
    Birgden A; Cucolo H
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Sep; 23(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 20937793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preventing sexual violence: can examination of offense location inform sex crime policy?
    Colombino N; Mercado CC; Levenson J; Jeglic E
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 21531024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk assessment of sexual offenders for extended supervision orders in New Zealand: basic principles and current practice.
    Vess J
    J Child Sex Abus; 2009; 18(2):174-89. PubMed ID: 19306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy.
    Kokish R; Levenson JS; Blasingame GD
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Apr; 17(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 15974426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic and risk profiles among civilly committed sex offenders in Washington State.
    Jackson RL; Richards HJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 17478861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.
    Campbell TW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 12645049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult sexual offenders:current issues and future directions.
    Geffner RA; Crumpton Franey K; Falconer R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):1-16. PubMed ID: 15308445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of theory in the assessment of sex offenders.
    Quackenbush RE
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):77-102. PubMed ID: 15308448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.