355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20944563)
1. Teetering on the brink.
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):987. PubMed ID: 20944563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum.
Hatch OG
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Embryonic stem cells. Controversial ruling throws U.S. research into a tailspin.
Kaiser J; Vogel G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5996):1132-3. PubMed ID: 20813924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis.
Gross GS
Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court battle. What's next for stem cell research?
Kaiser J
Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6001):163. PubMed ID: 20929744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos.
George EP
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver.
Levine RJ
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cells. NIH wins in appeals court, but legal battle continues.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):651. PubMed ID: 21551039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science and the law. With stem cells in court, a history primer.
Vogel G; Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5998):1450-1. PubMed ID: 20847238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research.
Majumder MA; Cohen CB
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical research. A first step in relaxing restrictions on stem cell research.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5920):1412-3. PubMed ID: 19286523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Obama executive order. For Congress and NIH, headaches ahead on stem cells.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1552-3. PubMed ID: 19299595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stem cell research and conditional federal funding: do state laws allowing more extensive research pose a problem for federalism?
Schiller C
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2004 May; 31(4):1017-54. PubMed ID: 16514766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
Holden C; Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem cell funding widens.
Netterwald J
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Aug; 27(8):681. PubMed ID: 19668157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Miller JF
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Newhart AB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
