306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20945067)
1. Maximum diameter measurements of aortic aneurysms on axial CT images after endovascular aneurysm repair: sufficient for follow-up?
Baumueller S; Nguyen TD; Goetti RP; Lachat M; Seifert B; Pfammatter T; Frauenfelder T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1182-9. PubMed ID: 20945067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT angiography in analysis of anatomical suitability for stentgraft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Pitoulias GA; Donas KP; Schulte S; Aslanidou EA; Papadimitriou DK
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 21498369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Corriere MA; Islam A; Craven TE; Conlee TD; Hurie JB; Edwards MS
J Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 59(5):1224-31.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24439321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative planning for endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility of nonenhanced MR angiography versus contrast-enhanced CT angiography.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Kawada H; Kojima T; Sakurai K; Watanabe H; Shimabukuro K; Matsuno Y; Ishida N; Takemura H; Bae KT
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):948-55. PubMed ID: 23392427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models.
Hyhlik-Dürr A; Krieger T; Geisbüsch P; Kotelis D; Able T; Böckler D
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 21679063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of gender and aortic aneurysm size on eligibility for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Sweet MP; Fillinger MF; Morrison TM; Abel D
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 21658895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-term clinical outcomes and morphological changes after endovascular aneurysm repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single-center experience.
Lee SH; Won JY; Lee DY; Kim IJ; Lee SJ; Kim MD; Park SI; Lee KH; Ko YG; Choi DH; Kim EK
Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 24609870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of 64-row computed tomography abdominal aortic aneurysm neck measurements.
Diehm N; Kickuth R; Gahl B; Do DD; Schmidli J; Rattunde H; Baumgartner I; Dick F
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 45(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 17264000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What Is the Optimal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Measurement on CT Images during Follow-up after Endovascular Repair?
Boos J; Brook OR; Fang J; Temin N; Brook A; Raptopoulos V
Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):1032-1041. PubMed ID: 28787262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multidimensional growth measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Martufi G; Auer M; Roy J; Swedenborg J; Sakalihasan N; Panuccio G; Gasser TC
J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):748-55. PubMed ID: 23611712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wever JJ; Blankensteijn JD; van Rijn JC; Broeders IA; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1279-82. PubMed ID: 11044022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional ultrasound improves the accuracy of diameter measurement of the residual sac in EVAR patients.
Bredahl K; Taudorf M; Long A; Lönn L; Rouet L; Ardon R; Sillesen H; Eiberg JP
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 46(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 24091092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional ultrasonography measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair.
Causey MW; Jayaraj A; Leotta DF; Paun M; Beach KW; Kohler TR; Zierler ER; Starnes BW
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 22749436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrepancies in determination of abdominal aortic aneurysms maximum diameter and growth rate, using axial and orhtogonal computed tomography measurements.
Kontopodis N; Metaxa E; Gionis M; Papaharilaou Y; Ioannou CV
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 23727377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic feasibility of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in emergency in the era of the chimney technique: impact on an emergency endovascular kit.
Brossier J; Coscas R; Capdevila C; Kitzis M; Coggia M; Goeau-Brissonniere O
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 27(7):844-50. PubMed ID: 23993103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aortic repair: comparison of volumetric and diametric measurement.
Hahne JD; Arndt C; Herrmann J; Schönnagel B; Adam G; Habermann CR
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1187-91. PubMed ID: 21493027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel method to estimate iliac tortuosity in evaluating EVAR access.
Kristmundsson T; Sonesson B; Resch T
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Apr; 19(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 22545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT angiography in stent-graft sizing: impact of using inner vs. outer wall measurements of aortic neck diameters.
Iezzi R; Dattesi R; Pirro F; Nestola M; Santoro M; Snider F; Bonomo L
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 21679062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Diagnostic Accuracy of Diameter Measurements for the Detection of Aneurysm Sac Enlargement.
Schnitzbauer M; Güntner O; Wohlgemuth WA; Zeman F; Haimerl M; Stroszczynski C; Müller-Wille R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):178-187.e3. PubMed ID: 29217411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Follow-up of aneurysm neck diameter after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Soberón AB; de Garcia MM; Möll GG; Vigil BR; Krauel MA; Alvarez-Sala Walter R
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 18411031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]