708 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20945264)
1. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research.
Shamoo AE; Schwartz J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Children and research participation: who makes what decisions.
Simpson C
Health Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):20-9. PubMed ID: 15706697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: autonomy and beneficence.
Newman E; Kaloupek D
J Trauma Stress; 2009 Dec; 22(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 19885873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Context is key for voluntary and informed consent.
Sears JM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):47-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics of research involving children.
Lynch A
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Oct; 25(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 11659510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Making informed consent meaningful.
Brody BA
IRB; 2001; 23(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 12737171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore.
Ramachandran AJ
J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15239181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
