These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20945264)
1. Rethinking research ethics. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rethinking research ethics. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? Miller FG Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Universal and uniform protections of human subjects in research. Shamoo AE; Schwartz J Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):3-5. PubMed ID: 19061094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Children and research participation: who makes what decisions. Simpson C Health Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):20-9. PubMed ID: 15706697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'. Levine RJ Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects. J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research. Vernillo A Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research versus innovation: real differences. Morreim H Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: autonomy and beneficence. Newman E; Kaloupek D J Trauma Stress; 2009 Dec; 22(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 19885873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights. Katerberg RJ J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J; Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics. Simmerling M; Schwegler B Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Context is key for voluntary and informed consent. Sears JM Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):47-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics of research involving children. Lynch A Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Oct; 25(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 11659510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Making informed consent meaningful. Brody BA IRB; 2001; 23(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 12737171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore. Ramachandran AJ J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15239181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some questionable premises about research ethics. Macklin R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]