128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20945267)
1. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promise and perils" five years later.
Hyman SE
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 20945267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):40-8. PubMed ID: 20945266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 16036700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain imaging and the Bill of Rights: memory detection technologies and American criminal justice.
Fox D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):34-6; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology--the ethical terrain.
Eaton ML; Illes J
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 25(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 17420741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
Schauer F
Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: scientific, ethical, and legal issues.
Meegan DV
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 18236327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prospects for neuro-exceptionalism: transparent lies, naked minds.
Wachbroit R
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18236325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
Schauer F
Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Knowing sin: making sure good science doesn't go bad.
Greely HT
Cerebrum; 2006 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 17120373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):918-9. PubMed ID: 16791164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?
Simpson JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 19092066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Technical development of detecting deception].
Zhao H; Kang M
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 23(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 17330762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie detection and the fifth amendment.
Stoller SE; Wolpe PR
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):359-75. PubMed ID: 17910164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuroethics needed.
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):907. PubMed ID: 16791155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection.
Davatzikos C; Ruparel K; Fan Y; Shen DG; Acharyya M; Loughead JW; Gur RC; Langleben DD
Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 16169252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethicists urge caution over emotive power of brain scans.
Check E
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):254-5. PubMed ID: 15902216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulation.
Greely HT; Illes J
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):377-431. PubMed ID: 17910165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuroethical theories.
Häyry M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Apr; 19(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 20226100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
