These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20945750)

  • 1. Degree of conversion of luting resins around ceramic inlays in natural deep cavities: a micro-Raman spectroscopy analysis.
    Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Belli R; Schmitt J; Mocker E; Jandt KD; Müller FA
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 20945750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG; González-Lopez S; Bolaños-Carmona V; Maurício PJ; Félix SA; Carvalho PA
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis.
    Acquaviva PA; Cerutti F; Adami G; Gagliani M; Ferrari M; Gherlone E; Cerutti A
    J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 19450917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
    Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.
    Trajtenberg CP; Caram SJ; Kiat-amnuay S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 18666496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ceramic thickness on mechanical properties and polymer structure of dual-cured resin luting agents.
    Meng X; Yoshida K; Atsuta M
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 17669482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
    Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns.
    Gregor L; Bouillaguet S; Onisor I; Ardu S; Krejci I; Rocca GT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):942-8. PubMed ID: 24767899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs.
    Jung H; Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Furch H; Bernhart S; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 16536196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.