210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20946455)
21. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?
Ada S; Seçkin D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1192-6. PubMed ID: 20236197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contact allergy to essential oils cannot always be predicted from allergy to fragrance markers in the baseline series.
Sabroe RA; Holden CR; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Apr; 74(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 26806578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.
Camacho-Halili M; Axelrod S; Michelis MA; Lighvani S; Khan F; Leon S; Aquino MR; Davis-Lorton M; Fonacier LS
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Dec; 107(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 22123377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patch testing with hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) - a multicentre study of the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Engfeldt M; Hagvall L; Isaksson M; Matura M; Mowitz M; Ryberg K; Stenberg B; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 27767215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fragrance contact allergic patients: strategies for use of cosmetic products and perceived impact on life situation.
Lysdal SH; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Dec; 61(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 20059491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization?
White JM; McFadden JP; White IR
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 158(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 18205877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contact allergy to fragrances: current patch test results (2005-2008) from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology.
Uter W; Geier J; Frosch P; Schnuch A
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 20731693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens.
Wang WH; Li LF; Lu XY; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 16364117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Trend of contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Thais over a period of 10 years.
Boonchai W; Desomchoke R; Iamtharachai P
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 22077433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sensitization to fragrances in Spain: A 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015).
Silvestre JF; Mercader P; González-Pérez R; Hervella-Garcés M; Sanz-Sánchez T; Córdoba S; Sánchez-Pérez J; Heras-Mendoza F; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gatica-Ortega ME; Pastor-NIeto MA; Zaragoza V; Carrascosa JM; García-Bravo B; Ruiz-González I; Borrego L; Sánchez-Pedreño P; de Frutos JO; Armario-Hita JC; García-Gavín J; Fernández-Redondo V
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Feb; 80(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 30430587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Majantol.
Herro E; Jacob SE
Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 21504697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fragrance allergy could be missed without patch testing with 26 individual fragrance allergens.
Vejanurug P; Tresukosol P; Sajjachareonpong P; Puangpet P
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Apr; 74(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 26948414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test® and Trolab® test material.
Mortz CG; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):248-53. PubMed ID: 20946453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Unexpected sensitization routes and general frequency of contact allergies in an elderly stented Swedish population.
Svedman C; Ekqvist S; Möller H; Björk J; Gruvberger B; Holmström E; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17577375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland--a multicentre study.
Hasan T; Rantanen T; Alanko K; Harvima RJ; Jolanki R; Kalimo K; Lahti A; Lammintausta K; Lauerma AI; Laukkanen A; Luukkaala T; Riekki R; Turjanmaa K; Varjonen E; Vuorela AM
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15982231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
