131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2094655)
1. Variations in occlusal forces with a resilient internal implant shock absorber.
Chapman RJ; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 2094655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Falk H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
Lin CL; Wang JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusal stability in implant prosthodontics -- clinical factors to consider before implant placement.
Saba S
J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 67(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 11597344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusal interferences and cantilever joint stress in implant-supported prostheses occluding with complete dentures.
Falk H; Laurell L; Lundgren D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 2391138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The effect of bedding type on implant and abutment tooth in tooth/implant-supported bridgework].
Krämer A; Weber H
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):686-8. PubMed ID: 1817863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal forces and chewing ability in dentitions with cross-arch bridges.
Laurell L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1985; 26():160p.. PubMed ID: 3901379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonsimultaneous tooth contact in combined implant and natural tooth occlusal schemes.
Kerstein RB
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(9):751-5. PubMed ID: 11862925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A computerized method for evaluating distribution of occlusal load on implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Matsui Y; Neukam FW; Wichmann M; Ohno K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 8820124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of a posterior implant support for extra shortened dental arches: a biomechanical model analysis.
Maeda Y; Sogo M; Tsutsumi S
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):656-60. PubMed ID: 16102078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants.
Lum LB
J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 1811063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analyzing dental occlusion for implants: Tekscan's TScan III.
Garg AK
Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Sep; 18(9):65-70. PubMed ID: 17944069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale.
Kim Y; Oh TJ; Misch CE; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 15642028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between natural tooth and osseointegrated implant.
Leung T; Lai VF
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Sep; 8(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 11307564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency.
Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 14651231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
