These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2094656)
1. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Mericske-Stern R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 2094656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service. Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol. Walton JN Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a prospective study of ITI implants. Gatti C; Haefliger W; Chiapasco M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 10874803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible. Røynesdal AK; Amundrud B; Hannaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11324212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implants and sinus-inlay graft in a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophied maxillae: prosthodontic aspects in a 3-year follow-up study. Smedberg JI; Johansson P; Ekenbäck D; Wannfors D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11669249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Payne AG; Solomons YF Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters. Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support. Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-implant mandibular overdentures: simple to fabricate and easy to wear. Klemetti E; Chehade A; Takanashi Y; Feine JS J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 12556267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 edentulous mandibles. Mau J; Behneke A; Behneke N; Fritzemeier CU; Gomez-Roman G; d'Hoedt B; Spiekermann H; Strunz V; Yong M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):835-47. PubMed ID: 14696659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegrated dental implants with ball attachments supporting overdentures in patients with mandibular alveolar ridge atrophy. Donatsky O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 8359871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Bergendal T; Engquist B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 9581412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]