These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20946961)

  • 1. Functional asymmetries in the representation of noise-vocoded speech.
    Millman RE; Woods WP; Quinlan PT
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2364-73. PubMed ID: 20946961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representations of the temporal envelope of sounds in human auditory cortex: can the results from invasive intracortical "depth" electrode recordings be replicated using non-invasive MEG "virtual electrodes"?
    Millman RE; Prendergast G; Hymers M; Green GG
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():185-96. PubMed ID: 22989625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of viewing speech on auditory speech processing is different in the left and right hemispheres.
    Davis C; Kislyuk D; Kim J; Sams M
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():151-61. PubMed ID: 18538750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The representation of noise vocoded speech in the auditory nerve of the chinchilla: physiological correlates of the perception of spectrally reduced speech.
    Loebach JL; Wickesberg RE
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):130-44. PubMed ID: 16497455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus.
    Wienbruch C; Paul I; Weisz N; Elbert T; Roberts LE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):180-94. PubMed ID: 16901722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production.
    Giraud AL; Kleinschmidt A; Poeppel D; Lund TE; Frackowiak RS; Laufs H
    Neuron; 2007 Dec; 56(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18093532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention modulates hemispheric differences in functional connectivity: evidence from MEG recordings.
    Gootjes L; Bouma A; Van Strien JW; Scheltens P; Stam CJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 16253520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2154-64. PubMed ID: 22609577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetrical representation of auditory space in human cortex.
    Salminen NH; Tiitinen H; Miettinen I; Alku P; May PJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1306():93-9. PubMed ID: 19799877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception.
    Osnes B; Hugdahl K; Specht K
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2437-45. PubMed ID: 20932914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activation of human auditory cortex during speech perception: effects of monaural, binaural, and dichotic presentation.
    Stefanatos GA; Joe WQ; Aguirre GK; Detre JA; Wetmore G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):301-15. PubMed ID: 18023460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural correlate of speech rhythm as evidenced by metrical speech processing.
    Geiser E; Zaehle T; Jancke L; Meyer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):541-52. PubMed ID: 18004944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.
    Zaehle T; Wüstenberg T; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2447-56. PubMed ID: 15525285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech.
    Hannemann R; Obleser J; Eulitz C
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():134-43. PubMed ID: 17451657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling for individual differences in fMRI brain activation to tones, syllables, and words.
    Rimol LM; Specht K; Hugdahl K
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 16343948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatiotemporal frequency tuning of BOLD and gamma band MEG responses compared in primary visual cortex.
    Muthukumaraswamy SD; Singh KD
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1552-60. PubMed ID: 18337125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audio-visual congruency alters power and coherence of oscillatory activity within and between cortical areas.
    Lange J; Christian N; Schnitzler A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():111-20. PubMed ID: 23644355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain.
    Giraud AL; Lorenzi C; Ashburner J; Wable J; Johnsrude I; Frackowiak R; Kleinschmidt A
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 84(3):1588-98. PubMed ID: 10980029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neuroanatomic differences in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss detected using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Propst EJ; Greinwald JH; Schmithorst V
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 136(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20083773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.