126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20947042)
21. Feasibility of spectral shaping for detection and quantification of coronary calcifications in ultra-low dose CT.
Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Huijsse SE; Meyer M; Greuter MJ; Henzler T; Flohr TG; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 27572809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Coronary calcium scoring at 100kVp: a new twist to a familiar test.
Rivera JJ; Agatston AS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(6):401-2. PubMed ID: 20083061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Fully automated quantification method (FQM) of coronary calcium in an anthropomorphic phantom.
van Praagh GD; van der Werf NR; Wang J; van Ommen F; Poelhekken K; Slart RHJA; Fleischmann D; Greuter MJW; Leiner T; Willemink MJ
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3730-3740. PubMed ID: 33932026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A model for quantitative correction of coronary calcium scores on multidetector, dual source, and electron beam computed tomography for influences of linear motion, calcification density, and temporal resolution: a cardiac phantom study.
Greuter MJ; Groen JM; Nicolai LJ; Dijkstra H; Oudkerk M
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5079-88. PubMed ID: 19994518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ACCURATUM: improved calcium volume scoring using a mesh-based algorithm--a phantom study.
Saur SC; Alkadhi H; Desbiolles L; Székely G; Cattin PC
Eur Radiol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 18818930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrated intensity-based technique for coronary artery calcium mass measurement: A phantom study.
Black D; Xiao X; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4930-4942. PubMed ID: 36852776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative analysis of small coronary artery calcium detectability with an accurate simulation and validation on a clinical CT scanner.
Severance LM; Pack JD; Contijoch FJ; McVeigh ER
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6060-6070. PubMed ID: 37523236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of coronary calcification using calibrated mass score with two different multidetector computed tomography scanners in the Copenhagen General Population Study.
Fuchs A; Groen JM; Arnold BA; Nikolovski S; Knudsen AD; Kühl JT; Nordestgaard BG; Greuter MJ; Kofoed KF
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():21-25. PubMed ID: 28189204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility--MESA study.
Detrano RC; Anderson M; Nelson J; Wong ND; Carr JJ; McNitt-Gray M; Bild DE
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 15972340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT--assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods.
Hong C; Bae KT; Pilgram TK
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 12728184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Coronary artery calcifications: a critical assessment of imaging techniques.
Lembcke A
Blood Purif; 2007; 25(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 17170548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electron beam CT versus 16-MDCT on the variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements in a variable heart rate phantom.
Horiguchi J; Shen Y; Akiyama Y; Hirai N; Sasaki K; Ishifuro M; Nakanishi T; Ito K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 16177422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of three generations of electron beam tomography on image noise and reproducibility, a phantom study.
Chau A; Gopal A; Mao S; Tseng PH; Fischer H; Budoff MJ
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jun; 41(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 16763471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Framework for Photon Counting Quantitative Material Decomposition.
Juntunen MAK; Inkinen SI; Ketola JH; Kotiaho A; Kauppinen M; Winkler A; Nieminen MT
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jan; 39(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 31144630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Threshold adjusted calcium scoring using CT is less susceptible to cardiac motion and more accurate.
Groen JM; Dijkstra H; Greuter MJ; Oudkerk M
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):438-46. PubMed ID: 19291982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo.
Vliegenthart R; Song B; Hofman A; Witteman JC; Oudkerk M
Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):520-5. PubMed ID: 14500853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Coronary artery calcium scoring: influence of reconstruction interval and reconstruction increment using 64-MDCT.
Schlosser T; Hunold P; Voigtländer T; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):1063-8. PubMed ID: 17377048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensitivity to detect small coronary artery calcium lesions with varying slice thickness using electron beam tomography.
Mao S; Child J; Carson S; Liu SC; Oudiz RJ; Budoff MJ
Invest Radiol; 2003 Mar; 38(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 12595800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Head-to-head comparison of coronary plaque evaluation between multislice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.
Pundziute G; Schuijf JD; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Sarno G; Vanhoenacker PK; Reiber JH; Schalij MJ; Wijns W; Bax JJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 19463297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Measurement of coronary artery calcium with dual-slice helical CT compared with coronary angiography: evaluation of CT scoring methods, interobserver variations, and reproducibility.
Broderick LS; Shemesh J; Wilensky RL; Eckert GJ; Zhou X; Torres WE; Balk MA; Rogers WJ; Conces DJ; Kopecky KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 8686622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
