These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20947079)

  • 1. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics.
    Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First clinical experience in urologic surgery with a novel robotic lightweight laparoscope holder.
    Long JA; Tostain J; Lanchon C; Voros S; Medici M; Descotes JL; Troccaz J; Cinquin P; Rambeaud JJ; Moreau-Gaudry A
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22834862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: a review of modalities and the literature.
    Jernigan AM; Auer M; Fader AN; Escobar PF
    Womens Health (Lond); 2012 May; 8(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 22554172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solo surgeon single-port laparoscopic surgery with a homemade laparoscope-anchored instrument system in benign gynecologic diseases.
    Yang YS; Kim SH; Jin CH; Oh KY; Hur MH; Kim SY; Yim HS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):695-701. PubMed ID: 24509292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.
    Nezhat F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S29-32. PubMed ID: 18762326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with a palm-controlled laparoscope holder.
    Polet R; Donnez J
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Feb; 11(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 15104836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology: a critical interim appraisal].
    Bartos P; Struppl D; Trhlík M; Czudek S; Skrovina M; Adamcík L; Soumarová R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Oct; 72(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 18175521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic surgery in the obese gynecologic patient.
    Burke WM; Gossner G; Goldman NA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):420-30. PubMed ID: 21857172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.
    Maheshwari M; Ind T
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 26531201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.
    Nezhat C; Saberi NS; Shahmohamady B; Nezhat F
    JSLS; 2006; 10(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 17212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.
    Mettler L; Schollmeyer T; Boggess J; Magrina JF; Oleszczuk A
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2008 Sep; 20(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 19106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
    Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
    Advincula AP; Wang K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19423061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery.
    Jaspers JE; Breedveld P; Herder JL; Grimbergen CA
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2004 Jun; 14(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 15471021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
    Ballantyne GH
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Advincula AP; Song A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
    Sert MB; Eraker R
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
    Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.