These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20947204)

  • 1. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
    Green SM; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers.
    Callaham M; McCulloch C
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21074894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Richardson ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?
    García-Doval I
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance?
    Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE
    Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
    Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Authors, reviewers and editors at The EMBO Journal.
    Rørth P
    EMBO J; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3831-3. PubMed ID: 16453402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New authors' guidelines for Palliative Medicine: more work for authors, reviewers and editors or an essential tool?
    Walshe C
    Palliat Med; 2010 Sep; 24(6):559-60. PubMed ID: 20837732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.
    Callaham ML; Tercier J
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e40. PubMed ID: 17411314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State of the Journal: Women First Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editorial Board Members at Annals of Emergency Medicine.
    Kaji AH; Meurer WJ; Napper T; Nigrovic LE; Mower WR; Schriger DL; Cooper RJ;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2019 Dec; 74(6):731-735. PubMed ID: 31280922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].
    Alfonso F
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 21093700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does The Journal of Pathology deal with conflict of interest?
    Hall PA; Poulsom R; Wixon J
    J Pathol; 2009 Dec; 219(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 19827054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
    Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.