346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20947917)
1. Comparison of the over-the-head, lateral and alternating positions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a single rescuer with a bag--valve--mask device.
Maisch S; Gamon E; Ilisch A; Goetz AE; Schmidt GN
Emerg Med J; 2011 Nov; 28(11):974-8. PubMed ID: 20947917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is superior to mouth-to-pocket mask and bag-valve-mask ventilation during lifeguard CPR: a randomized study.
Adelborg K; Dalgas C; Grove EL; Jørgensen C; Al-Mashhadi RH; Løfgren B
Resuscitation; 2011 May; 82(5):618-22. PubMed ID: 21330044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Over-the-head cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves efficacy in basic life support performed by professional medical personnel with a single rescuer: a simulation study.
Hüpfl M; Duma A; Uray T; Maier C; Fiegl N; Bogner N; Nagele P
Anesth Analg; 2005 Jul; 101(1):200-5, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15976232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ventilation and cardiac compressions using the Impact Model 730 automatic transport ventilator compared to a conventional bag valve with a facemask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest.
Salas N; Wisor B; Agazio J; Branson R; Austin PN
Resuscitation; 2007 Jul; 74(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 17287062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: a randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis.
Hong DY; Park SO; Lee KR; Baek KJ; Shin DH
Resuscitation; 2012 Mar; 83(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 22101200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standard versus over-the-head cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simulated advanced life support.
Bollig G; Steen PA; Wik L
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 17907030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of manually triggered ventilation and bag-valve-mask ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a manikin model.
Bergrath S; Rossaint R; Biermann H; Skorning M; Beckers SK; Rörtgen D; Brokmann JCh; Flege C; Fitzner C; Czaplik M
Resuscitation; 2012 Apr; 83(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 21958929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: a randomised controlled manikin study.
Fischer H; Neuhold S; Zapletal B; Hochbrugger E; Koinig H; Steinlechner B; Frantal S; Stumpf D; Greif R
Resuscitation; 2011 Jul; 82(7):913-9. PubMed ID: 21444144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time used for ventilation in two-rescuer CPR with a bag-valve-mask device during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Odegaard S; Pillgram M; Berg NE; Olasveengen T; Kramer-Johansen J
Resuscitation; 2008 Apr; 77(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18164533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Over-the-head two-thumb encircling technique as an alternative to the two-finger technique in the in-hospital infant cardiac arrest setting: a randomised crossover simulation study.
Jo CH; Jung HS; Cho GC; Oh YJ
Emerg Med J; 2015 Sep; 32(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 25433046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices.
Bennett S; Finer NN; Rich W; Vaucher Y
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 16081202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two instructional modalities for nursing student CPR skill acquisition.
Kardong-Edgren SE; Oermann MH; Odom-Maryon T; Ha Y
Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1019-24. PubMed ID: 20566391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by two rescuers: a simulation study.
Maisch S; Issleib M; Kuhls B; Mueller J; Horlacher T; Goetz AE; Schmidt GN
J Emerg Med; 2010 Sep; 39(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 19500939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved basic life support performance by ward nurses using the CAREvent Public Access Resuscitator (PAR) in a simulated setting.
Monsieurs KG; De Regge M; Vogels C; Calle PA
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 16129540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
