139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20949469)
1. Cellient™ automated cell block versus traditional cell block preparation: a comparison of morphologic features and immunohistochemical staining.
Wagner DG; Russell DK; Benson JM; Schneider AE; Hoda RS; Bonfiglio TA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Oct; 39(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 20949469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of 31 of the most commonly used immunohistochemical antibodies in cytology prepared using the Cellient(®) automated cell block system.
Montgomery E; Gao C; de Luca J; Bower J; Attwood K; Ylagan L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1024-33. PubMed ID: 24678031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Cellient(™) automated cell block system and agar cell block method.
Kruger AM; Stevens MW; Kerley KJ; Carter CD
Cytopathology; 2014 Dec; 25(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 25376104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Cellient(™) cytoblocks: better, stronger, faster?
Prendeville S; Brosnan T; Browne TJ; McCarthy J
Cytopathology; 2014 Dec; 25(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 24943912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of breast carcinoma prognostic/predictive biomarkers on cell blocks obtained by various methods: Cellient, formalin and thrombin.
Gorman BK; Kosarac O; Chakraborty S; Schwartz MR; Mody DR
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 22555532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of immunohistochemistry staining and cytologic diagnosis by using cell block sections prepared with effusion fluid cytology specimens].
Mao YY; Yang M; Liu DG; Lin MH; Zhang LQ; Chen ZQ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 38(8):547-50. PubMed ID: 20021967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective application of the methanol-based PreservCyt(™) fixative and the Cellient(™) automated cell block processor to diagnostic cytopathology, immunocytochemistry, and molecular biology.
van Hemel BM; Suurmeijer AJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):734-41. PubMed ID: 23444168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new convenient technique for making cell blocks.
He QL; Zhu YZ; Zheng GJ; Shi LC; Hu SW; Li CT
Cell Tissue Res; 2012 Nov; 350(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 22895623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphometric differences between cytologically benign and malignant serous effusions.
Gavin FM; Gray C; Sutton J; Clayden AD; Banks RI; Bird CC
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 2450434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of clot examination for malignant cells in serous effusions.
Jalal R; Aftab K; Hasan SH; Pervez S
Cytopathology; 2009 Aug; 20(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 18627403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A modified cell block technique for fine needle aspiration cytology.
Zito FA; Gadaleta CD; Salvatore C; Filotico R; Labriola A; Marzullo A; Prete F; Marzullo F
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 7847016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of the capsule-based technique for cell block preparation - in body fluids and Liqui-PREP™ specimens.
Wen CH; Tsao SC; Su YC; Wu CC; Chai CY
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 21986175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making the diagnosis with only two levels of nongynecologic cell blocks as opposed to three is more cost effective.
Zanchelli-Astran G; Wood M; Bibbo M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):374-6. PubMed ID: 20301096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic utility of calretinin immunohistochemistry in cytologic cell block preparations.
Wieczorek TJ; Krane JF
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 90(5):312-9. PubMed ID: 11038429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of cellient cell blocks in low-cellularity thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies.
Horton M; Been L; Starling C; Traweek ST
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Sep; 44(9):737-41. PubMed ID: 27338858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of cytology microarray constructed from effusion cell blocks for immunomarker validation.
Pu RT; Giordano TJ; Michael CW
Cancer; 2008 Oct; 114(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 18798226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cellular morphometry in nongynecologic thin-layer and filter cytologic specimens.
Bishop JW; Sims KL
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Aug; 20(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 9739408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cell blocks from scraping of cytology smear: comparison with conventional cell block.
Bhatia P; Dey P; Uppal R; Shifa R; Srinivasan R; Nijhawan R
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 18540299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunocytochemical staining of unstained versus previously stained cytologic preparations.
Abendroth CS; Dabbs DJ
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 7539200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of immunomarkers for the identification of adrenocortical cells in cytology specimens.
Jalali M; Krishnamurthy S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Aug; 33(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16007649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
