These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20950452)

  • 1. Inferring gene regression networks with model trees.
    Nepomuceno-Chamorro IA; Aguilar-Ruiz JS; Riquelme JC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():517. PubMed ID: 20950452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MICRAT: a novel algorithm for inferring gene regulatory networks using time series gene expression data.
    Yang B; Xu Y; Maxwell A; Koh W; Gong P; Zhang C
    BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Dec; 12(Suppl 7):115. PubMed ID: 30547796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Building Transcriptional Association Networks in Cytoscape with RegNetC.
    Nepomuceno-Chamorro IA; Marquez-Chamorro A; Aguilar-Ruiz JS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(4):823-4. PubMed ID: 26357322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SIN-KNO: A method of gene regulatory network inference using single-cell transcription and gene knockout data.
    Wang H; Lian Y; Li C; Ma Y; Yan Z; Dong C
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2019 Dec; 17(6):1950035. PubMed ID: 32019417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A copula method for modeling directional dependence of genes.
    Kim JM; Jung YS; Sungur EA; Han KH; Park C; Sohn I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():225. PubMed ID: 18447957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. REGNET: mining context-specific human transcription networks using composite genomic information.
    Chi SM; Seo YK; Park YK; Yoon S; Park CY; Kim YS; Kim SY; Nam D
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):450. PubMed ID: 24912499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods to reconstruct and compare transcriptional regulatory networks.
    Babu MM; Lang B; Aravind L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 541():163-80. PubMed ID: 19381525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Network motif-based analysis of regulatory patterns in paralogous gene pairs.
    Melkus G; Rucevskis P; Celms E; Čerāns K; Freivalds K; Kikusts P; Lace L; Opmanis M; Rituma D; Viksna J
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Jun; 18(3):2040008. PubMed ID: 32698721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of module-based versus direct methods for reverse-engineering transcriptional regulatory networks.
    Michoel T; De Smet R; Joshi A; Van de Peer Y; Marchal K
    BMC Syst Biol; 2009 May; 3():49. PubMed ID: 19422680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting patterns of gene expression: signatures of coregulation, the data processing inequality, and triplet motifs.
    Ku WL; Duggal G; Li Y; Girvan M; Ott E
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31969. PubMed ID: 22393375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IRIS: a method for reverse engineering of regulatory relations in gene networks.
    Morganella S; Zoppoli P; Ceccarelli M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():444. PubMed ID: 20030818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcriptional network inference from functional similarity and expression data: a global supervised approach.
    Ambroise J; Robert A; Macq B; Gala JL
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):Article 2. PubMed ID: 22499684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A statistical method to incorporate biological knowledge for generating testable novel gene regulatory interactions from microarray experiments.
    Larsen P; Almasri E; Chen G; Dai Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():317. PubMed ID: 17727721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting genetic interactions with random walks on biological networks.
    Chipman KC; Singh AK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():17. PubMed ID: 19138426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State Space Model with hidden variables for reconstruction of gene regulatory networks.
    Wu X; Li P; Wang N; Gong P; Perkins EJ; Deng Y; Zhang C
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3. PubMed ID: 22784622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. mAPC-GibbsOS: an integrated approach for robust identification of gene regulatory networks.
    Shi X; Gu J; Chen X; Shajahan A; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 24564939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ensemble learning approach to reverse-engineering transcriptional regulatory networks from time-series gene expression data.
    Ruan J; Deng Y; Perkins EJ; Zhang W
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 19594885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene networks reconstruction and time-series prediction from microarray data using recurrent neural fuzzy networks.
    Maraziotis IA; Dragomir A; Bezerianos A
    IET Syst Biol; 2007 Jan; 1(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 17370428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional mutual inclusive information enables accurate quantification of associations in gene regulatory networks.
    Zhang X; Zhao J; Hao JK; Zhao XM; Chen L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):e31. PubMed ID: 25539927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HiNO: an approach for inferring hierarchical organization from regulatory networks.
    Hartsperger ML; Strache R; Stümpflen V
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13698. PubMed ID: 21079808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.