These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20950633)

  • 81. When can listeners detect disfluency in spontaneous speech?
    Lickley RJ; Bard EG
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 2)():203-26. PubMed ID: 10194877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The impact of musicianship on the cortical mechanisms related to separating speech from background noise.
    Zendel BR; Tremblay CD; Belleville S; Peretz I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 25390195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Disfluencies along the garden path: brain electrophysiological evidence of disrupted sentence processing.
    Maxfield ND; Lyon JM; Silliman ER
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):86-100. PubMed ID: 19765813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Manual disfluency in drawing while producing and listening to disfluent speech.
    Dayalu V; Teulings HL; Bowers A; Crawcour S; Saltuklaroglu T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 23810715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: revisiting the N400.
    Strauß A; Kotz SA; Obleser J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Aug; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 23489145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Detecting silent pauses in speech: a new tool for measuring on-line lexical and semantic processing.
    Mattys SL; Pleydell-Pearce CW; Melhorn JF; Whitecross SE
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Dec; 16(12):958-64. PubMed ID: 16313660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. How and when predictability interacts with accentuation in temporally selective attention during speech comprehension.
    Li X; Lu Y; Zhao H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():71-84. PubMed ID: 25250708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. (De-)accentuation and the process of information status: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Baumann S; Schumacher PB
    Lang Speech; 2012 Sep; 55(Pt 3):361-81. PubMed ID: 23094319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Less is not more: neural responses to missing and superfluous accents in context.
    Dimitrova DV; Stowe LA; Redeker G; Hoeks JC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 24(12):2400-18. PubMed ID: 23016764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Weisz N; Bertrand O
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1669-80. PubMed ID: 22067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. The effects of duration and frequency of occurrence of voiceless fricatives on listeners' perceptions of sound prolongations.
    Kawai N; Healey EC; Carrell TD
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 22436827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Hearing sounds as words: Neural responses to environmental sounds in the context of fluent speech.
    Uddin S; Heald SLM; Van Hedger SC; Nusbaum HC
    Brain Lang; 2018 Apr; 179():51-61. PubMed ID: 29522954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Flexible predictions during listening comprehension: Speaker reliability affects anticipatory processes.
    Brothers T; Dave S; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Dec; 135():107225. PubMed ID: 31605686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. The effect of gap duration on the perception of fluent versus disfluent speech.
    Warner HJ; Whalen DH; Harel D; Jackson ES
    J Fluency Disord; 2022 Mar; 71():105896. PubMed ID: 35032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Recognizing intentions in infant-directed speech: evidence for universals.
    Bryant GA; Barrett HC
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Aug; 18(8):746-51. PubMed ID: 17680948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Primitive computations in speech processing.
    Endress AD; Mehler J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2187-209. PubMed ID: 19418378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Long-term temporal tracking of speech rate affects spoken-word recognition.
    Baese-Berk MM; Heffner CC; Dilley LC; Pitt MA; Morrill TH; McAuley JD
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1546-53. PubMed ID: 24907119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. I Forget What That's Called! Children's Online Processing of Disfluencies Depends on Speaker Knowledge.
    Orena AJ; White KS
    Child Dev; 2015; 86(6):1701-9. PubMed ID: 26344559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. When the brain tames the tongue: covert editing of inappropriate language.
    Severens E; Janssens I; Kühn S; Brass M; Hartsuiker RJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 21361966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Rapid recognition at 10 months as a predictor of language development.
    Junge C; Kooijman V; Hagoort P; Cutler A
    Dev Sci; 2012 Jul; 15(4):463-73. PubMed ID: 22709396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.