258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20950723)
21. Mice lacking thrombospondin 2 show an atypical pattern of endocortical and periosteal bone formation in response to mechanical loading.
Hankenson KD; Ausk BJ; Bain SD; Bornstein P; Gross TS; Srinivasan S
Bone; 2006 Mar; 38(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 16290255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diaphyseal bone formation in murine tibiae in response to knee loading.
Zhang P; Tanaka SM; Jiang H; Su M; Yokota H
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 May; 100(5):1452-9. PubMed ID: 16410382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo and in vitro evidence that the high osteoblastic activity in C3H/HeJ mice compared to C57BL/6J mice is intrinsic to bone cells.
Sheng MH; Lau KH; Beamer WG; Baylink DJ; Wergedal JE
Bone; 2004 Sep; 35(3):711-9. PubMed ID: 15336608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Trabecular bone response to mechanical and parathyroid hormone stimulation: the role of mechanical microenvironment.
Kim CH; Takai E; Zhou H; von Stechow D; Müller R; Dempster DW; Guo XE
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Dec; 18(12):2116-25. PubMed ID: 14672346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone Formation is Affected by Matrix Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) In Vivo.
Yang X; Mostafa AJ; Appleford M; Sun LW; Wang X
Calcif Tissue Int; 2016 Oct; 99(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 27240574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Additional weight bearing during exercise and estrogen in the rat: the effect on bone mass, turnover, and structure.
Tromp AM; Bravenboer N; Tanck E; Oostlander A; Holzmann PJ; Kostense PJ; Roos JC; Burger EH; Huiskes R; Lips P
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Dec; 79(6):404-15. PubMed ID: 17160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of micro-CT protocols for in vivo follow-up of mouse bone architecture without major radiation side effects.
Laperre K; Depypere M; van Gastel N; Torrekens S; Moermans K; Bogaerts R; Maes F; Carmeliet G
Bone; 2011 Oct; 49(4):613-22. PubMed ID: 21763477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. μCT-based, in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry allows 3D evaluation of the early responses of bone resorption and formation to PTH and alendronate combination therapy.
de Bakker CM; Altman AR; Tseng WJ; Tribble MB; Li C; Chandra A; Qin L; Liu XS
Bone; 2015 Apr; 73():198-207. PubMed ID: 25554598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Experimental and finite element analysis of the mouse caudal vertebrae loading model: prediction of cortical and trabecular bone adaptation.
Webster D; Wirth A; van Lenthe GH; Müller R
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):221-30. PubMed ID: 21472383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sclerostin antibody increases bone mass by stimulating bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption in a hindlimb-immobilization rat model.
Tian X; Jee WS; Li X; Paszty C; Ke HZ
Bone; 2011 Feb; 48(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 20850580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Increased osteoblastogenesis and decreased bone resorption protect against ovariectomy-induced bone loss in thrombospondin-2-null mice.
Hankenson KD; James IE; Apone S; Stroup GB; Blake SM; Liang X; Lark MW; Bornstein P
Matrix Biol; 2005 Aug; 24(5):362-70. PubMed ID: 15979292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton.
Xie L; Jacobson JM; Choi ES; Busa B; Donahue LR; Miller LM; Rubin CT; Judex S
Bone; 2006 Nov; 39(5):1059-1066. PubMed ID: 16824816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.
Jariwala SH; Wee H; Roush EP; Whitcomb TL; Murter C; Kozlansky G; Lakhtakia A; Kunselman AR; Donahue HJ; Armstrong AD; Lewis GS
J Orthop Res; 2017 May; 35(5):997-1006. PubMed ID: 27381807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Site specific bone adaptation response to mechanical loading.
Kuruvilla SJ; Fox SD; Cullen DM; Akhter MP
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2008; 8(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 18398268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Continuous treatment with a low-dose β-agonist reduces bone mass by increasing bone resorption without suppressing bone formation.
Kondo H; Togari A
Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Jan; 88(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 20882384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intermittent minodronic acid treatment with sufficient bone resorption inhibition prevents reduction in bone mass and strength in ovariectomized rats with established osteopenia comparable with daily treatment.
Kimoto A; Tanaka M; Nozaki K; Mori M; Fukushima S; Mori H; Shiroya T; Nakamura T
Bone; 2013 Jul; 55(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 23486179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microfluidic enhancement of intramedullary pressure increases interstitial fluid flow and inhibits bone loss in hindlimb suspended mice.
Kwon RY; Meays DR; Tang WJ; Frangos JA
J Bone Miner Res; 2010 Aug; 25(8):1798-807. PubMed ID: 20200992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Strain rate influences periosteal adaptation in mature bone.
LaMothe JM; Hamilton NH; Zernicke RF
Med Eng Phys; 2005 May; 27(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 15823468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Periosteal Bone Surface is Less Mechano-Responsive than the Endocortical.
Birkhold AI; Razi H; Duda GN; Weinkamer R; Checa S; Willie BM
Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23480. PubMed ID: 27004741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monitoring in vivo (re)modeling: a computational approach using 4D microCT data to quantify bone surface movements.
Birkhold AI; Razi H; Weinkamer R; Duda GN; Checa S; Willie BM
Bone; 2015 Jun; 75():210-21. PubMed ID: 25746796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
