139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20950774)
1. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Archampong D; Borowski DW; Dickinson HO
Surgeon; 2010 Dec; 8(6):341-52. PubMed ID: 20950774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancer.
Richardson DP; Porter GA; Johnson PM
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 22968065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.
Chioreso C; Del Vecchio N; Schweizer ML; Schlichting J; Gribovskaja-Rupp I; Charlton ME
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Nov; 61(11):1320-1332. PubMed ID: 30286023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anastomotic Leaks After Restorative Resections for Rectal Cancer Compromise Cancer Outcomes and Survival.
Lu ZR; Rajendran N; Lynch AC; Heriot AG; Warrier SK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Mar; 59(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 26855399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the choice of hospital increase a chance of survival in rectal cancer?
Pawlak M; Morawiec Z; Dziki Ł; Morawiec J; Kolacińska A; Dziki A
Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 Dec; 84(12):638-45. PubMed ID: 23399631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery.
Salz T; Sandler RS
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):1185-93. PubMed ID: 18829393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
Iversen LH
Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study.
Comber H; Sharp L; Timmons A; Keane FB
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e692-700. PubMed ID: 22731759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anastomotic leak and cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Karim A; Cubas V; Zaman S; Khan S; Patel H; Waterland P
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Jun; 24(6):513-525. PubMed ID: 32206962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M
Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Knowledge Translation Interventions for Surgeons and Their Association With Process and Outcome Measures Among Patients Undergoing Rectal Cancer Surgery.
Simunovic M; Urbach DR; Fahim C; O'Brien MA; Earle CC; Brouwers M; Gatov E; Grubac V; McCormack D; Baxter N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jul; 4(7):e2117536. PubMed ID: 34269805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anastomotic leak is not associated with oncologic outcome in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Smith JD; Paty PB; Guillem JG; Temple LK; Weiser MR; Nash GM
Ann Surg; 2012 Dec; 256(6):1034-8. PubMed ID: 22584695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgeon-related aspects of the treatment and outcome after radical resection for rectal cancer.
Penninckx F
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2001; 64(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 11680044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Total mesorectal excision versus conventional radical surgery for rectal cancer: a meta analysis].
Liang YC; Qing SH; Ding WX; Chen PY; Huang YB; Yu HT
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jan; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17253173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome.
Iversen LH; Harling H; Laurberg S; Wille-Jørgensen P;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jan; 9(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17181844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery.
van Gijn W; Gooiker GA; Wouters MW; Post PN; Tollenaar RA; van de Velde CJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S55-63. PubMed ID: 20615649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient survival after surgical treatment of rectal cancer: impact of surgeon and hospital characteristics.
Etzioni DA; Young-Fadok TM; Cima RR; Wasif N; Madoff RD; Naessens JM; Habermann EB
Cancer; 2014 Aug; 120(16):2472-81. PubMed ID: 24802276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.
Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.
Martling A; Cedermark B; Johansson H; Rutqvist LE; Holm T
Br J Surg; 2002 Aug; 89(8):1008-13. PubMed ID: 12153626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
