These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20950774)
1. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archampong D; Borowski DW; Dickinson HO Surgeon; 2010 Dec; 8(6):341-52. PubMed ID: 20950774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancer. Richardson DP; Porter GA; Johnson PM Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 22968065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Chioreso C; Del Vecchio N; Schweizer ML; Schlichting J; Gribovskaja-Rupp I; Charlton ME Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Nov; 61(11):1320-1332. PubMed ID: 30286023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anastomotic Leaks After Restorative Resections for Rectal Cancer Compromise Cancer Outcomes and Survival. Lu ZR; Rajendran N; Lynch AC; Heriot AG; Warrier SK Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Mar; 59(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 26855399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the choice of hospital increase a chance of survival in rectal cancer? Pawlak M; Morawiec Z; Dziki Ł; Morawiec J; Kolacińska A; Dziki A Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 Dec; 84(12):638-45. PubMed ID: 23399631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. Salz T; Sandler RS Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):1185-93. PubMed ID: 18829393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark. Iversen LH Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study. Comber H; Sharp L; Timmons A; Keane FB Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e692-700. PubMed ID: 22731759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anastomotic leak and cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Karim A; Cubas V; Zaman S; Khan S; Patel H; Waterland P Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Jun; 24(6):513-525. PubMed ID: 32206962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data. Amato L; Fusco D; Acampora A; Bontempi K; Rosa AC; Colais P; Cruciani F; D'Ovidio M; Mataloni F; Minozzi S; Mitrova Z; Pinnarelli L; Saulle R; Soldati S; Sorge C; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Davoli M Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. PubMed ID: 29205995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Knowledge Translation Interventions for Surgeons and Their Association With Process and Outcome Measures Among Patients Undergoing Rectal Cancer Surgery. Simunovic M; Urbach DR; Fahim C; O'Brien MA; Earle CC; Brouwers M; Gatov E; Grubac V; McCormack D; Baxter N JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jul; 4(7):e2117536. PubMed ID: 34269805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anastomotic leak is not associated with oncologic outcome in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Smith JD; Paty PB; Guillem JG; Temple LK; Weiser MR; Nash GM Ann Surg; 2012 Dec; 256(6):1034-8. PubMed ID: 22584695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgeon-related aspects of the treatment and outcome after radical resection for rectal cancer. Penninckx F Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2001; 64(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 11680044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Total mesorectal excision versus conventional radical surgery for rectal cancer: a meta analysis]. Liang YC; Qing SH; Ding WX; Chen PY; Huang YB; Yu HT Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jan; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17253173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome. Iversen LH; Harling H; Laurberg S; Wille-Jørgensen P; Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jan; 9(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17181844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. van Gijn W; Gooiker GA; Wouters MW; Post PN; Tollenaar RA; van de Velde CJ Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S55-63. PubMed ID: 20615649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient survival after surgical treatment of rectal cancer: impact of surgeon and hospital characteristics. Etzioni DA; Young-Fadok TM; Cima RR; Wasif N; Madoff RD; Naessens JM; Habermann EB Cancer; 2014 Aug; 120(16):2472-81. PubMed ID: 24802276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Martling A; Cedermark B; Johansson H; Rutqvist LE; Holm T Br J Surg; 2002 Aug; 89(8):1008-13. PubMed ID: 12153626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]