BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20951177)

  • 1. The therapeutic equivalence of complex drugs.
    Schellekens H; Klinger E; Mühlebach S; Brin JF; Storm G; Crommelin DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 20951177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Product individuality of commercially available low-molecular-weight heparins and their generic versions: therapeutic implications.
    Maddineni J; Walenga JM; Jeske WP; Hoppensteadt DA; Fareed J; Wahi R; Bick RL
    Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2006 Jul; 12(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 16959680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiating low-molecular-weight heparins based on chemical, biological, and pharmacologic properties: implications for the development of generic versions of low-molecular-weight heparins.
    Jeske WP; Walenga JM; Hoppensteadt DA; Vandenberg C; Brubaker A; Adiguzel C; Bakhos M; Fareed J
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Feb; 34(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 18393144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generic low-molecular-weight heparins: some practical considerations.
    Fareed J; Leong WL; Hoppensteadt DA; Jeske WP; Walenga J; Wahi R; Bick RL
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2004 Dec; 30(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 15630677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural and functional characterization of low-molecular-weight heparins: impact on the development of guidelines for generic products.
    Adiguzel C; Jeske WP; Hoppensteadt D; Walenga JM; Bansal V; Fareed J
    Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2009; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 19357102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the bioequivalence of biosimilars The Retacrit case.
    Schellekens H
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 May; 14(9-10):495-9. PubMed ID: 19429509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: a Canadian perspective.
    Harrison JJ; Schiff JR; Coursol CJ; Daley CJ; Dipchand AI; Heywood NM; Keough-Ryan TM; Keown PA; Levy GA; Lien DC; Wichart JR; Cantarovich M
    Transplantation; 2012 Apr; 93(7):657-65. PubMed ID: 22267158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biosimilars: how similar or dissimilar are they?
    Roger SD
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2006 Aug; 11(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 16889575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low molecular weight heparins differ substantially: impact on developing biosimilar drugs.
    Walenga JM; Jackson CM; Kessler CM
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2011 Apr; 37(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential concerns about generic substitution: bioequivalence versus therapeutic equivalence of different amlodipine salt forms.
    Meredith PA
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Sep; 25(9):2179-89. PubMed ID: 19601710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current regulatory approaches of bioequivalence testing.
    Karalis V; Macheras P
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 8(8):929-42. PubMed ID: 22681436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioequivalence and narrow therapeutic index drugs.
    Benet LZ; Goyan JE
    Pharmacotherapy; 1995; 15(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 7479195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biosimilar medicines--new challenges for a new class of medicine.
    Fox A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 20077245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical assessment of biosimilar products.
    Chow SC; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):10-30. PubMed ID: 20077246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biosimilars: it's not as simple as cost alone.
    Roger SD; Goldsmith D
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2008 Oct; 33(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 18834359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nanoparticle iron medicinal products - Requirements for approval of intended copies of non-biological complex drugs (NBCD) and the importance of clinical comparative studies.
    Borchard G; Flühmann B; Mühlebach S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Nov; 64(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 22951348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability and impact on design of bioequivalence studies.
    Van Peer A
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 106(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 20041877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of generic low molecular weight heparins: a perspective.
    Fareed J; Leong W; Hoppensteadt DA; Jeske WP; Walenga J; Bick RL
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2005 Feb; 19(1):53-68, v-vi. PubMed ID: 15639108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The scope and requirements related to preclinical and clinical studies of a new medicinal product, including biotechnological and biosimilar products.
    Brodniewicz-Proba T
    Acta Pol Pharm; 2008; 65(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 19172845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical Considerations in the Design of Biosimilar Cancer Clinical Trials.
    Ahn C; Lee SC
    Ungyong Tonggye Yongu; 2011 Jun; 24(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 23805045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.