These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20951234)

  • 1. Validation of a risk-assessment scale and a risk-adapted monitoring plan for academic clinical research studies--the Pre-Optimon study.
    Journot V; Pignon JP; Gaultier C; Daurat V; Bouxin-Métro A; Giraudeau B; Preux PM; Tréluyer JM; Chevret S; Plättner V; Thalamas C; Clisant S; Ravaud P; Chêne G;
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 20951234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk analysis and risk adapted on-site monitoring in noncommercial clinical trials.
    Brosteanu O; Houben P; Ihrig K; Ohmann C; Paulus U; Pfistner B; Schwarz G; Strenge-Hesse A; Zettelmeyer U
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):585-96. PubMed ID: 19897532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oiling the wheels of intensive care to reduce "machine friction": the best way to improve outcomes?
    Walker S; Brett S
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Oct; 38(10 Suppl):S642-8. PubMed ID: 21164409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
    Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.
    Worrall G; Chaulk P; Freake D
    CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(12):1705-12. PubMed ID: 9220922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy.
    Kocsis JH; Gerber AJ; Milrod B; Roose SP; Barber J; Thase ME; Perkins P; Leon AC
    Compr Psychiatry; 2010; 51(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 20399343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical practice guidelines on trial.
    Hayward RS
    CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(12):1725-7. PubMed ID: 9220924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence should not be viewed in isolation.
    Moreno R; Rhodes A
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Oct; 38(10 Suppl):S528-33. PubMed ID: 21164393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to evaluate a dental article about harm.
    Jacob RF; Lloyd PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 10898835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adequacy of published oncology randomized controlled trials to provide therapeutic details needed for clinical application.
    Duff JM; Leather H; Walden EO; LaPlant KD; George TJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):702-5. PubMed ID: 20410466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why should we include women and minorities in randomized controlled trials?
    Weijer C; Crouch RA
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 10633280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designing an acupuncture study to meet evidence-based medical criteria: methodological considerations for logistic design and development of treatment interventions arising from the German randomized controlled acupuncture trial on chronic shoulder pain (GRASP).
    Molsberger AF; Mau J; Gotthardt H; Schneider T; Drabik A
    Eur J Med Res; 2004 Aug; 9(8):405-11. PubMed ID: 15337631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From quality of publication to quality of care: translating trials to practice.
    Dancey JE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):670-1. PubMed ID: 20410467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.
    Evans J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):701-3. PubMed ID: 20399923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study design: statistical and methodologic considerations.
    Rubenfeld GD
    Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):980-6. PubMed ID: 10152244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the quality of clinical research.
    Vamvakas EC
    Vox Sang; 2002 Aug; 83 Suppl 1():397-401. PubMed ID: 12617175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based dentistry. How to use it.
    Seidel-Bittke D
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):50-5. PubMed ID: 12705010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical myology at the crossroads; the gospel truth.
    Dubowitz V
    Neuromuscul Disord; 2010 Feb; 20(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 20142012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.