535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20951447)
1. Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
Erb HN
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):165-74. PubMed ID: 20951447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases.
Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):136-43. PubMed ID: 20950876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
Parent N; Hanley JA
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.
Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publishing in English-language journals.
Davis AJ; Tschudin V
Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication guidelines need widespread adoption.
Larson EL; Cortazal M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 22000815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The pattern of publishing previously rejected articles in selected journals.
Whitman N; Eyre S
Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3843082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors.
Meerpohl JJ; Wolff RF; Niemeyer CM; Antes G; von Elm E
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2010 Mar; 164(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20194261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
Eldredge J
Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
Shashok K
Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.
Bartus CL; Katz KA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety.
O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; Dewey CE; Dohoo IR; Evans RB; Gray JT; Greiner M; Keefe G; Lefebvre SL; Morley PS; Ramirez A; Sischo W; Smith DR; Snedeker K; Sofos J; Ward MP; Wills R
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jan; 93(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19926151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of reporting in infertility journals.
Glujovsky D; Boggino C; Riestra B; Coscia A; Sueldo CE; Ciapponi A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 25455871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
