These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2095150)

  • 21. Total hip replacement with cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses. A comparison of clinical and radiographic results at two to four years.
    Wixson RL; Stulberg SD; Mehlhoff M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1991 Feb; 73(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 1899667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Femoral bone adaptation to stable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs.
    Bergh MS; Muir P; Markel MD; Manley PA
    Vet Surg; 2004; 33(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15104627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Bobyn JD; Mortimer ES; Glassman AH; Engh CA; Miller JE; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):79-96. PubMed ID: 1729025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bone remodeling and in vivo strain analysis of intact and implanted greyhound proximal femora.
    Szivek JA; Johnson EM; Magee FP; Emmanual J; Poser R; Koeneman JB
    J Invest Surg; 1994; 7(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 7918244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
    Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A long-term in vivo bone strain measurement device.
    Szivek JA; Magee FP
    J Invest Surg; 1989; 2(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 2487248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Femoral bone adaptation to unstable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs.
    Bergh MS; Muir P; Markel MD; Manley PA
    Vet Surg; 2004; 33(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 15104630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Binnington AG; Szivek JA
    J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 3305844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design and fabrication of cementless hip stems.
    Walker PS; Robertson DD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):25-34. PubMed ID: 3416530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Activity intensity, assistive devices and joint replacement influence predicted remodelling in the proximal femur.
    Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Feb; 15(1):181-94. PubMed ID: 26183472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantification of holographic fringe data: comparison of intact and implanted femurs.
    Katz DM; Blatcher S; Shelton JC
    Med Eng Phys; 1998 Mar; 20(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 9679230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical properties of femoral cortical bone following cemented hip replacement.
    Ni GX; Lu WW; Chiu PK; Wang Y; Li ZY; Zhang YG; Xu B; Deng LF; Luk KD
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1408-14. PubMed ID: 17506504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mid-term results of previously cemented hip arthroplasties revised with uncemented modular femoral components: a retrospective study.
    Duymus TM; Solak Z; Ozturkmen Y; Azboy I; Mutlu S; Caniklioglu M
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Aug; 10():123. PubMed ID: 26269201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthogonal view analysis for evaluating the femoral component position of total hip implants in dogs using postoperative radiographs.
    Jehn CT; Bergh MS; Manley PA
    Vet Surg; 2003; 32(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 12692758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 7602395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Alterations in bone remodeling in the femur after medullary reaming and cemented hip arthroplasty in dogs.
    VanEnkevort BA; Markel MD; Manley PA
    Am J Vet Res; 1999 Aug; 60(8):922-8. PubMed ID: 10451197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model.
    Turner TM; Sumner DR; Urban RM; Rivero DP; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Dec; 68(9):1396-409. PubMed ID: 3782212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.