These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20951630)
1. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Roediger HL; Butler AC Trends Cogn Sci; 2011 Jan; 15(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 20951630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Karpicke JD; Roediger HL Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):966-8. PubMed ID: 18276894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Karpicke JD; Butler AC; Roediger HL Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 19358016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Butler AC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1118-33. PubMed ID: 20804289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Karpicke JD; Blunt JR Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6018):772-5. PubMed ID: 21252317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury. Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Szpunar KK; McDermott KB; Roediger HL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1392-9. PubMed ID: 18980403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Critical Importance of Retrieval--and Spacing--for Learning. Soderstrom NC; Kerr TK; Bjork RA Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 26674128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Remembering can cause inhibition: retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process. Veling H; van Knippenberg A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 14979806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Karpicke JD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The costs and benefits of testing text materials. Little JL; Storm BC; Bjork EL Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):346-59. PubMed ID: 21678153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Chan JC; McDermott KB; Roediger HL J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):553-71. PubMed ID: 17087573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough? Rawson KA; Dunlosky J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 21707204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Rowland CA Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of knowledge about the use of cues to aid prospective retrieval. Beal CR Child Dev; 1985 Jun; 56(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 4006571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]