These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20951756)
1. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency. Wang NC; Venkatapathy R; Bruce RM; Moudgal C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Mar; 59(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 20951756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency. Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens? Gaylor DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of 1,1-dichloroethylene (vinylidene chloride). Roberts SM; Jordan KE; Warren DA; Britt JK; James RC Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 11846635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines. Kar S; Roy K Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates. Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of classification and regression based QSAR models to predict rodent carcinogenic potency using oral slope factor. Kar S; Deeb O; Roy K Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2012 Aug; 82():85-95. PubMed ID: 22698880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QSARs of aromatic amines: identification of potent carcinogens. Franke R; Gruska A; Bossa C; Benigni R Mutat Res; 2010 Sep; 691(1-2):27-40. PubMed ID: 20600167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling of the carcinogenic risk of nitroso compounds using regression analysis and the TOPS-MODE approach. Helguera AM; Pérez-Machado G; Cordeiro MN; Combes RD SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):277-304. PubMed ID: 20544552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options. McClellan RO Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):149-79. PubMed ID: 8744594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative structure carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso-compounds. Helguera AM; González MP; D S Cordeiro MN; Pérez MA Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 221(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 17477948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of QSAR models for predicting hepatocarcinogenic toxicity of chemicals. Massarelli I; Imbriani M; Coi A; Saraceno M; Carli N; Bianucci AM Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3658-64. PubMed ID: 19272677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens. Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative structure-carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso compounds: species, rat; sex, female; route of administration, gavage. Morales Helguera A; Pérez González M; Dias Soeiro Cordeiro MN; Cabrera Pérez MA Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 21(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 18293904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of predictive models for nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity using both toxicogenomics and quantitative structure-activity relationships. Liu Z; Kelly R; Fang H; Ding D; Tong W Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 21627106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database. Gold LS; Slone TH J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A combination of 3D-QSAR, docking, local-binding energy (LBE) and GRID study of the species differences in the carcinogenicity of benzene derivatives chemicals. Fratev F; Benfenati E J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Sep; 27(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 18495507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]