These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20952228)
1. Prevention of relapse following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy mandibular setback: can coronoidotomy help? Talesh KT; Motamedi MH; Yazdani J; Ghavimi A; Ghoreishizadeh A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 May; 111(5):557-60. PubMed ID: 20952228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transverse displacement and angulation of the proximal segment after mandibular setback by means of bilateral intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. Bayat M; Badri A; Momen-Heravi F; Garajei A; Asgarian A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):906-10. PubMed ID: 21185637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hard and soft tissue stability of orthognathic surgery. Kitahara T; Nakasima A; Kurahara S; Shiratsuchi Y Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 19123720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative mandibular stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation. Lai W; Yamada K; Hanada K; Ali IM; Takagi R; Kobayashi T; Hayashi T Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11934051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The long term stability after orthognathic surgery in prognathic patients with mandibular asymmetry]. Lai W; Kazuhiro Y; Kooji H; Ritsuo T; Tadaharu K Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Jan; 34(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 15600196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes of transverse mandibular width after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Jung YS; Kim SY; Park SY; Choi YD; Park HS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 20188605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of treatment modality for skeletal Class III malocclusion with labioversed upper incisors and/or protrusive maxilla: surgical movement and stability of rotational maxillary setback procedure. Baek SH; Kim K; Choi JY J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):2049-54. PubMed ID: 19881370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies. Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positional stability following intentional posterior ostectomy of the distal segment in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Kim MJ; Kim SG; Park YW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12064881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the effect of 3 orthognathic surgical methods on the mandibular range of movement. Yazdani J; Ebrahimi H; Talesh KT; Khashabi E; Pourshahidi S; Tadbir AA J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):703-5. PubMed ID: 20485032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study. Kung AYH; Leung YY Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial. Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a simple method to prevent medial trapping of the proximal fragment. Blinder D; Peleg O; Yoffe T; Taicher S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 39(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 20129757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative changes in mandibular prognathism surgically treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Nihara J; Takeyama M; Takayama Y; Mutoh Y; Saito I Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 22858240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative stability following bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy based on amount of setback. Jung HD; Jung YS; Kim SY; Kim DW; Park HS Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):822-6. PubMed ID: 23484677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method. Takazakura D; Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Shamiul A; Yamamoto E Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17141470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy used to correct Class III malocclusion: review of the literature. Costa F; Robiony M; Politi M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11482290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]