30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20952771)
1. Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.
Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 29116615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
Kim S; Cho YS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional repulsion effects produced by feature-guided shifts of attention.
Baumeler D; Nako R; Born S; Eimer M
J Vis; 2020 Mar; 20(3):10. PubMed ID: 32232375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial transfer of object-based statistical learning.
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):768-775. PubMed ID: 38316722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing.
Kunar MA; Wolfe JM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2077-91. PubMed ID: 21691902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attention modulates trans-saccadic integration.
Stewart EEM; Schütz AC
Vision Res; 2018 Jan; 142():1-10. PubMed ID: 29183779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interplay of goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences on spatial orienting.
Otten M; Schreij D; Los SA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1642-54. PubMed ID: 27259486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.
Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1104-20. PubMed ID: 26854530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of red light running camera flashes on younger and older drivers' attention and oculomotor control.
Wright TJ; Vitale T; Boot WR; Charness N
Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):755-67. PubMed ID: 26479014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming.
Theeuwes J
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130055. PubMed ID: 24018717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
Zhou X; Chen Q
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects.
Reppa I; Schmidt WC; Leek EC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):43-69. PubMed ID: 22052445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of position in object selection in vision.
van der Heijden AH
Psychol Res; 1993; 56(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 8310104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
