These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20952775)

  • 21. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Competition between endogenous and exogenous attention to nonemotional stimuli in social anxiety.
    Moriya J; Tanno Y
    Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):739-43. PubMed ID: 19803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is family special to the brain? An event-related fMRI study of familiar, familial, and self-face recognition.
    Platek SM; Kemp SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):849-58. PubMed ID: 19159636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object-based attention and visual area LO.
    de-Wit LH; Kentridge RW; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implied body action directs spatial attention.
    Gervais WM; Reed CL; Beall PM; Roberts RJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1437-43. PubMed ID: 20675790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.
    Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Wenger MJ; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):328-42. PubMed ID: 18315409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Face, body, and center of gravity mediate person detection in natural scenes.
    Bindemann M; Scheepers C; Ferguson HJ; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 20695695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What is top-down about contingent capture?
    Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Body image concern and selective attention to disgusting and non-self appearance-related stimuli.
    Onden-Lim M; Wu R; Grisham JR
    Body Image; 2012 Sep; 9(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 22898205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual processing of moving and static self body-parts.
    Frassinetti F; Pavani F; Zamagni E; Fusaroli G; Vescovi M; Benassi M; Avanzi S; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1988-93. PubMed ID: 19428432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Moors A; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 20079475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.