These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20952777)

  • 1. Task switching under predictable and unpredictable circumstances.
    Andreadis N; Quinlan PT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1776-90. PubMed ID: 20952777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of 40 h constant wakefulness on task-switching efficiency.
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Steinborn MB; Ulrich R
    J Sleep Res; 2009 Jun; 18(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 19645962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?
    Luwel K; Schillemans V; Onghena P; Verschaffel L
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):753-71. PubMed ID: 19239730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological evidence of the adaptive task-set inhibition in task switching.
    Hsieh S; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():122-31. PubMed ID: 19111680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching.
    Tieges Z; Snel J; Kok A; Wijnen JG; Lorist MM; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16549227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New paradigm for task switching strategies while performing multiple tasks: entropy and symbolic dynamics analysis of voluntary patterns.
    Guastello SJ; Gorin H; Huschen S; Peters NE; Fabisch M; Poston K
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2012 Oct; 16(4):471-97. PubMed ID: 22980455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A switch in task affects priming of pop-out: evidence for the role of episodes.
    Thomson DR; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):318-33. PubMed ID: 21264719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.
    Poulsen C; Luu P; Davey C; Tucker DM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):133-54. PubMed ID: 15922166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.