These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20952777)

  • 21. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching.
    Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selective attention and subjective confidence calibration.
    Schoenherr JR; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 20139451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Action video game experience reduces the cost of switching tasks.
    Cain MS; Landau AN; Shimamura AP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 22415446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Task switching across the life span: effects of age on general and specific switch costs.
    Reimers S; Maylor EA
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Jul; 41(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 16060812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The bivalency effect in task switching: general and enduring.
    Meier B; Woodward TS; Rey-Mermet A; Graf P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 19739903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching.
    Mueller SC; Swainson R; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1157():56-65. PubMed ID: 17544384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression.
    Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-notational semantic priming between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerosity.
    Herrera A; Macizo P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1538-52. PubMed ID: 18777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task switching in mild cognitive impairment: switch and nonswitch costs.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Sanders C
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Jan; 15(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 19128533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of orienting attention in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):648-60. PubMed ID: 22287208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching.
    Swainson R; Jackson SR; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16626653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Generic cognitive adaptations to task interference in task switching.
    Poljac E; Bekkering H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19733342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.