130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20952790)
1. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target identification.
Ngo MK; Spence C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1938-47. PubMed ID: 20952790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
Ngo MK; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
Ngo MK; Spence C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.
Ngo MK; Spence C
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 221(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 22760584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The crossmodal facilitation of visual object representations by sound: evidence from the backward masking paradigm.
Chen YC; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1784-802. PubMed ID: 21942418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
Santangelo V; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inverse target- and cue-priming effects of masked stimuli.
Mattler U
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 17311481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects.
Neill WT; Hutchison KA; Graves DF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 12075896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention.
Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C
Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors.
Schmidt F; Schmidt T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
