These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention. Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect. Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing. Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task. Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors. Schmidt F; Schmidt T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1480-94. PubMed ID: 20675795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects. Watson DG; Kunar MA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]