These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2095314)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of the plaque removal ability of .007 and .008 toothbrush bristles.
    Beatty CF; Fallon PA; Marshall DD
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990 Dec; 12(5):22-7. PubMed ID: 2095314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
    Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
    Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The safety and efficacy of a children's power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in 6-11 year-olds.
    García-Godoy F; Marcushamer M; Cugini M; Warren PR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 11699736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plaque removal and oral health promotion potential for the elmex interX medium toothbrush: clinical efficacy and safety evaluation.
    Sgan-Cohen HD; Vered Y
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(3):70-3. PubMed ID: 14520777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
    Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative clinical study of the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating/rotating power toothbrush and an ultrasonic toothbrush.
    He T; Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(4):138-42. PubMed ID: 19278084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):96-100. PubMed ID: 9238885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and an electric toothbrush on plaque removal.
    Barnes V; Battista GW; Petrone D; Petrone ME; Chaknis P; DeVizio W; Volpe AR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S30-3; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plaque removal efficacy of a newly developed powered toothbrush in the primary dentition of pre-school children.
    Borutta A
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(6):151-5. PubMed ID: 9586530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
    Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study.
    Nathoo S; Rustogi KN; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Zhang YP; Volpe AR; Proskin HM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S19-24; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plaque removal efficacy of an advanced rotation-oscillation power toothbrush versus a new sonic toothbrush.
    Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Goyal CR; Qaqish JG
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 18686772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4- to 5-year-old children.
    Silverman J; Rosivack RG; Matheson PB; Houpt MI
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 15185803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinical trial testing the efficacy of an ionic toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
    Moreira CH; Luz PB; Villarinho EA; Petri LC; Weidlich P; Rösing CK
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):123-5. PubMed ID: 18277743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plaque removal efficacy of two children's toothbrushes: a one-month study.
    Benson BJ; Henyon G; Grossman E
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 8357509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of three toothbrushes.
    Hanioka T; Tanaka M; Kataoka K; Ojima M; Shizukuishi S
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 8694984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.