These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20954220)

  • 1. Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'.
    Skaik YA
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2568. PubMed ID: 20954220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(2):200. PubMed ID: 21204125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20552570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
    Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
    Bloch DA
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size calculation using exact methods in diagnostic test studies.
    Chu H; Cole SR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1201-2; author reply 1202. PubMed ID: 17938064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies.
    Flahault A; Cadilhac M; Thomas G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):859-62. PubMed ID: 16018921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
    Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
    Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
    Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach.
    Garrett ES; Eaton WW; Zeger S
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1289-307. PubMed ID: 12111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ['Gold standard', not 'golden standard'].
    Claassen JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Dec; 149(52):2937. PubMed ID: 16402524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
    Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating the sampling variation of the disease prevalence when calculating the sample size in a study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a test.
    Yi Q; Panzarella T; Corey P
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug; 25(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 15296816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation].
    Läärä E; Aro S
    Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
    Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.