These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20954452)

  • 1. Digital 2D-photogrammetry and direct anthropometry--a comparing study on test accomplishment and measurement data.
    Franke-Gromberg C; Schüler G; Hermanussen M; Scheffler C
    Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 20954452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Face Anthropometry and Digital 2D-Face Photogrammetry as Methods for Predicting Vertical Dimension of Occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Perić M; Živković N; Lemić AM; Vučinić N; Miličić B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):282-292. PubMed ID: 37824121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Facial Anthropometry Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry and Direct Measuring Techniques.
    Düppe K; Becker M; Schönmeyr B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29608484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anthropometric Study of Three-Dimensional Facial Morphology in Malay Adults.
    Othman SA; Majawit LP; Wan Hassan WN; Wey MC; Mohd Razi R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164180. PubMed ID: 27706220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
    Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?
    Farkas LG; Bryson W; Klotz J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1980 Sep; 66(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 7422721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anthropometric comparison of the idealized youth and hideous old man of Leonardo's profile drawings.
    Hwang K; Heo WY; Jeong JM; Hwang SW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2223-6. PubMed ID: 25340691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques.
    Guo Y; Hou X; Rokohl AC; Jia R; Heindl LM
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):e23-e31. PubMed ID: 31809350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized photogrammetry used to calculate the brow position index.
    Naif-de-Andrade NT; Hochman B; Naif-de-Andrade CZ; Ferreira LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1047-51. PubMed ID: 22936380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photo-anthropometric study on face among Garo adult females of Bangladesh.
    Akhter Z; Banu ML; Alam MM; Hossain S; Nazneen M
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2013 Aug; 39(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 24930193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
    Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-Fidelity Anthropometric Facial Measurements Can Be Obtained From a Single Stereophotograph From the Vectra H1 3-Dimensional Camera.
    Jodeh DS; Rottgers SA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1164-1170. PubMed ID: 30955356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Talbert L; Pan F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1890-4. PubMed ID: 25072972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry.
    Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of cranial anthropometric measurement by traditional calipers to computed tomography and three-dimensional photogrammetry.
    Mendonca DA; Naidoo SD; Skolnick G; Skladman R; Woo AS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1106-10. PubMed ID: 23851749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.