These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20954673)

  • 1. Toe-touch weight bearing: myth or reality?
    Rubin G; Monder O; Zohar R; Oster A; Konra O; Rozen N
    Orthopedics; 2010 Oct; 33(10):729. PubMed ID: 20954673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gait rehabilitation: a new biofeedback device for monitoring and enhancing weight-bearing over the affected lower limb.
    Isakov E
    Eura Medicophys; 2007 Mar; 43(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17021589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of global and joint-to-joint methods for estimating the hip joint load and the muscle forces during walking.
    Fraysse F; Dumas R; Cheze L; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2357-62. PubMed ID: 19699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The gait of patients with full weightbearing capacity after hip prosthesis implantation on the treadmill with partial body weight support, during assisted walking and without crutches].
    Hesse S; Sonntag D; Bardeleben A; Käding M; Roggenbruck C; Conradi E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10441834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gait analysis before or after varus osteotomy of the femur for hip osteoarthritis.
    Watanabe H; Shimada Y; Sato K; Tsutsumi Y; Sato M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1998; 8(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 10065884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and interobserver reliability of visual observation to assess partial weight-bearing.
    Hurkmans HL; Bussmann JB; Benda E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 90(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 19236985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing.
    Heller MO; Bergmann G; Kassi JP; Claes L; Haas NP; Duda GN
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1155-63. PubMed ID: 15797596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The magnitude of forces acting on the proximal femur in various weight alleviating gait forms with reduced ground reaction forces].
    Savvidis E; Löer F
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1989; 127(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 2718586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acetabular loading in active abduction.
    Kristan A; Mavcic B; Cimerman M; Iglis A; Tonin M; Slivnik T; Kralj-Iglic V; Daniel M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Jun; 15(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17601195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kinematic analysis of functional lower body perturbations.
    Schmitz RJ; Shultz SJ; Kulas AS; Windley TC; Perrin DH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):1032-9. PubMed ID: 15531053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The difference between actual and prescribed weight bearing of total hip patients with a trochanteric osteotomy: long-term vertical force measurements inside and outside the hospital.
    Hurkmans HL; Bussmann JB; Selles RW; Benda E; Stam HJ; Verhaar JA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 17270518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient compliance with postoperative lower extremity touch-down weight-bearing orders at a level I academic trauma center.
    Ruiz FK; Fu MC; Bohl DD; Hustedt JW; Baumgaertner MR; Leslie MP; Grauer JN
    Orthopedics; 2014 Jun; 37(6):e552-6. PubMed ID: 24972436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of adding trunk motion to the interpretation of the role of joint moments during normal walking.
    Patel M; Talaty M; Ounpuu S
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3563-9. PubMed ID: 17765906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the accuracy of partial weight-bearing instruction.
    Gray FB; Gray C; McClanahan JW
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1998 Aug; 27(8):558-60. PubMed ID: 9732078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between flexibility and EMG activity pattern of the erector spinae muscles during trunk flexion-extension.
    Hashemirad F; Talebian S; Hatef B; Kahlaee AH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):746-53. PubMed ID: 18400517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscles limiting the sit-to-stand movement: an experimental simulation of muscle weakness.
    Van der Heijden MM; Meijer K; Willems PJ; Savelberg HH
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 19419871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofeedback in Partial Weight Bearing: Validity of 3 Different Devices.
    van Lieshout R; Stukstette MJ; de Bie RA; Vanwanseele B; Pisters MF
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Nov; 46(11):993-1001. PubMed ID: 27733088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of lifting belt use on multijoint motion and load bearing during repetitive and asymmetric lifting.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M; Reinsel TE; Simon S
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 9493771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muscle response times between shoe and no-shoe conditions following a weight-bearing rotary perturbation are similar in females.
    Lindenberg KM; Carcia CR
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):e329-33. PubMed ID: 18656384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segment-interaction analysis of the stance limb in sprint running.
    Hunter JP; Marshall RN; McNair PJ
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 15275853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.