These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20955394)

  • 21. Digital moiré interferometric investigations on the deformation gradients of enamel and dentine: an insight into non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kishen A; Tan KB; Asundi A
    J Dent; 2006 Jan; 34(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 15907356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions.
    Walter C; Kress E; Götz H; Taylor K; Willershausen I; Zampelis A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 23494453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Analysis of etiological factors involved in noncarious cervical lesions].
    Tomasik M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(3):125-36. PubMed ID: 17385359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abfraction lesions: myth or reality?
    Rees JS; Jagger DC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14620657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro demineralisation of the cervical region of human teeth.
    He LH; Xu Y; Purton DG
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 May; 56(5):512-9. PubMed ID: 21146152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mineral density of hypomineralised enamel.
    Farah RA; Swain MV; Drummond BK; Cook R; Atieh M
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 19737596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review.
    Badavannavar AN; Ajari S; Nayak KUS; Khijmatgar S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):305-311. PubMed ID: 32436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Non-carious cervical lesions and risk factors: A case-control study.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Alvarez-Menendez L; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Alvarez-Riesgo JA; Brizuela-Velasco A; deLlanos-Lanchares H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 46(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 30252966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of enamel bevel on the clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Da Costa TR; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Oct; 25(5):346-56. PubMed ID: 24148985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The cervical wedge-shaped lesion in teeth: a light and electron microscopic study.
    Daley TJ; Harbrow DJ; Kahler B; Young WG
    Aust Dent J; 2009 Sep; 54(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 19709108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Directing ultrasound at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of human teeth: I. Asymmetry of ultrasonic path lengths.
    John C
    Ultrasonics; 2005 May; 43(6):467-79. PubMed ID: 15823321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wedged cervical lesions produced by toothbrushing.
    Litonjua LA; Andreana S; Bush PJ; Tobias TS; Cohen RE
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 15478482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brief communication: Comparative patterns of enamel thickness topography and oblique molar wear in two Early Neolithic and medieval population samples.
    Le Luyer M; Rottier S; Bayle P
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Sep; 155(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 24961878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jun; 133(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 12083648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aetiology of abfraction lesions.
    Lyons K
    N Z Dent J; 2001 Sep; 97(429):93-8. PubMed ID: 11695152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cross-sectional study: non-carious cervical lesions, cervical dentine hypersensitivity and related risk factors.
    Que K; Guo B; Jia Z; Chen Z; Yang J; Gao P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Jan; 40(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 22882712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.