BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20955803)

  • 21. False positives in neuroimaging genetics using voxel-based morphometry data.
    Silver M; Montana G; Nichols TE;
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):992-1000. PubMed ID: 20849959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Permutation and parametric tests for effect sizes in voxel-based morphometry of gray matter volume in brain structural MRI.
    Dickie DA; Mikhael S; Job DE; Wardlaw JM; Laidlaw DH; Bastin ME
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 26253778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited.
    Eickhoff SB; Bzdok D; Laird AR; Kurth F; Fox PT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2349-61. PubMed ID: 21963913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cortical surface-based threshold-free cluster enhancement and cortexwise mediation.
    Lett TA; Waller L; Tost H; Veer IM; Nazeri A; Erk S; Brandl EJ; Charlet K; Beck A; Vollstädt-Klein S; Jorde A; Kiefer F; Heinz A; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Chakravarty MM; Walter H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Jun; 38(6):2795-2807. PubMed ID: 28317230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Data-analytical stability of cluster-wise and peak-wise inference in fMRI data analysis.
    Roels SP; Bossier H; Loeys T; Moerkerke B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():37-47. PubMed ID: 25445059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The bootstrap and cross-validation in neuroimaging applications: estimation of the distribution of extrema of random fields for single volume tests, with an application to ADC maps.
    Viviani R; Beschoner P; Jaeckle T; Hipp P; Kassubek J; Schmitz B
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1075-88. PubMed ID: 17266105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cluster failure or power failure? Evaluating sensitivity in cluster-level inference.
    Noble S; Scheinost D; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116468. PubMed ID: 31852625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Geometry-derived statistical significance: A probabilistic framework for detecting true positive findings in MRI data.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Brain Behav; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e2865. PubMed ID: 36869597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diffusion-based spatial priors for imaging.
    Harrison LM; Penny W; Ashburner J; Trujillo-Barreto N; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Dec; 38(4):677-95. PubMed ID: 17869542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies.
    Liou M; Su HR; Lee JD; Aston JA; Tsai AC; Cheng PE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 16226893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. All-Resolutions Inference for brain imaging.
    Rosenblatt JD; Finos L; Weeda WD; Solari A; Goeman JJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():786-796. PubMed ID: 30056198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Group-representative functional network estimation from multi-subject fMRI data via MRF-based image segmentation.
    Tang B; Iyer A; Rao V; Kong N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Oct; 179():104976. PubMed ID: 31443856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Full-brain auto-regressive modeling (FARM) using fMRI.
    Garg R; Cecchi GA; Rao AR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):416-41. PubMed ID: 21439388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cluster significance testing using the bootstrap.
    Auffermann WF; Ngan SC; Hu X
    Neuroimage; 2002 Oct; 17(2):583-91. PubMed ID: 12377136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A high performance 3D cluster-based test of unsmoothed fMRI data.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Xiong J; Zou Q; Fan Y; Ma Y; Shi T; Ge J; Gao JH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Sep; 98():537-46. PubMed ID: 24836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
    Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A sensitive, noise-resistant method for identifying focal demyelination and remyelination in patients with multiple sclerosis via voxel-wise changes in magnetization transfer ratio.
    Dwyer M; Bergsland N; Hussein S; Durfee J; Wack D; Zivadinov R
    J Neurol Sci; 2009 Jul; 282(1-2):86-95. PubMed ID: 19386319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.
    Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Let's Not Waste Time: Using Temporal Information in Clustered Activity Estimation with Spatial Adjacency Restrictions (CAESAR) for Parcellating FMRI Data.
    Janssen RJ; Jylänki P; van Gerven MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0164703. PubMed ID: 27935937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of inconsistent resolution on VBM studies.
    Pereira JM; Nestor PJ; Williams GB
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1711-7. PubMed ID: 18342543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.