2429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20955983)
21. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.
Gaia G; Holloway RW; Santoro L; Ahmad S; Di Silverio E; Spinillo A
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1422-1431. PubMed ID: 21099613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience.
Frey MK; Lin JF; Stewart LE; Makaroun L; Panico VJ; Holcomb K
J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(3-4):127-34. PubMed ID: 25898475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.
Terai Y; Tanaka T; Sasaki H; Kawaguchi H; Fujiwara S; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Kanemura M; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):570-5. PubMed ID: 24118459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.
Köhler C; Klemm P; Schau A; Possover M; Krause N; Tozzi R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 15385110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.
Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Extent of lymphadenectomy and postoperative major complications among women with endometrial cancer treated with minimally invasive surgery.
Polan RM; Rossi EC; Barber EL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):263.e1-263.e8. PubMed ID: 30521798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic single-port hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Yoon A; Yoo HN; Lee YY; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Kim TJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):322. PubMed ID: 25499776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Barrie A; Freeman AH; Lyon L; Garcia C; Conell C; Abbott LH; Littell RD; Powell CB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 27621195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical outcome of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymph node dissections compared with transperitoneal approach in gynecologic cancer patients.
Morales S; Zapardiel I; Grabowski JP; Hernandez A; Diestro MD; Gonzalez-Benitez C; De Santiago J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 23680520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
