These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20957019)

  • 21. A novel approach for treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: Miniplates-based skeletal anchorage.
    Al-Dumaini AA; Halboub E; Alhammadi MS; Ishaq RAR; Youssef M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):239-247. PubMed ID: 29407501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO; Paulin G
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
    Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions.
    Bravo LA; Canut JA; Pascual A; Bravo B
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9088600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distribution of Various Maxilla-Mandibular Positions and Cephalometric Comparison in Chinese Skeletal Class II Malocclusions.
    Xiong X; Huang Y; Liu W; Wu Y; Yi Y; Wang J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):822-828. PubMed ID: 33568599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cephalometric study of the effect of orthodontic treatment on the mandible in Class II, Division 1 patients].
    Atta JY; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2135330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in different skeletal malocclusions in relation to age.
    Kiełczykowski M; Perkowski K; Kamiński K; Zadurska M; Czochrowska E
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):711. PubMed ID: 38902685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mechanism of Class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult Class II, division 1 malocclusions.
    Pancherz H; Ruf S; Erbe C; Hansen K
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):800-9. PubMed ID: 15673144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Facial profile changes in early Class II correction with cervical headgear.
    Kirjavainen M; Hurmerinta K; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):960-7. PubMed ID: 18004917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic changes in morphometric analysis in patients following Class III bimaxillary surgery.
    Downarowicz P; Matthews-Brzozowska T; Kawala B; Drohomyretska M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2012; 21(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 23214305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Deguchi T; Katashiba S; Inami T; Foong KW; Huak CY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 20152678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
    Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.