These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20957019)

  • 41. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Maxillary and mandibular contribution to the establishment of class II malocclusion in an adult Lebanese population.
    El Hajj N; Bassil-Nassif N; Tauk A; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal JP
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):677-697. PubMed ID: 29113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Skeletal variations in children with Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Rusić-Tasić V
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1990; 23(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 2206405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A cephalometric evaluation of the dental and facial-skeletal effects using the Bionator with stepwise protrusive activations.
    Kumar S; Sidhu SS; Kharbanda OP
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 8619967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An investigation of cervicovertebral morphology in different sagittal skeletal growth patterns.
    Baydaş B; Yavuz I; Durna N; Ceylan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14994881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Skeletal and dental changes during the use of the bite-jumping plate. A cephalometric comparison with an untreated Class-II group].
    Sander FG; Wichelhaus A
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1995 May; 56(3):127-39. PubMed ID: 7789922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Outcomes of early versus late treatment of severe Class II high-angle patients.
    Cha JY; Kennedy DB; Turley PK; Joondeph DR; Baik HS; Hwang CJ; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 31474267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do bivariate and multivariate cephalometric analyses lead to different results concerning the skeletal cause of postnormal occlusion?
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Gedrange T
    Funct Orthod; 2005; 22(2):6-8, 10, 12-3. PubMed ID: 16536177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Hubbard GW; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Age effects on orthodontic treatment: adolescents contrasted with adults.
    Dyer GS; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 1962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children.
    Pancherz H; Zieber K; Hoyer B
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 9107375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.