192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20958179)
41. Test-enhanced learning versus errorless learning in aphasia rehabilitation: testing competing psychological principles.
Middleton EL; Schwartz MF; Rawson KA; Garvey K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1253-61. PubMed ID: 25528093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Achieving teamwork in stroke units: the contribution of opportunistic dialogue.
Clarke DJ
J Interprof Care; 2010 May; 24(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 19995268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The use of conversational analysis: nurse-patient interaction in communication disability after stroke.
Gordon C; Ellis-Hill C; Ashburn A
J Adv Nurs; 2009 Mar; 65(3):544-53. PubMed ID: 19222652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement.
Bright FA; Kayes NM; Cummins C; Worrall LM; McPherson KM
Clin Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1396-1405. PubMed ID: 28653548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A description of the outcomes, frequency, duration, and intensity of occupational, physical, and speech therapy in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Karges J; Smallfied S
J Allied Health; 2009; 38(1):E1-10. PubMed ID: 19753406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Trial shows only that practice varies.
Meteyard L
BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e6022; author reply e6023. PubMed ID: 22963947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Is early speech and language therapy after stroke a waste?
Rudd AG; Wolfe CD
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4870. PubMed ID: 22807163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The meaning and value of taking part in a person-centred arts programme to hospital-based stroke patients: findings from a qualitative study.
Baumann M; Peck S; Collins C; Eades G
Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Feb; 35(3):244-56. PubMed ID: 22758376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Conversation therapy for agrammatism: exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia.
Beckley F; Best W; Johnson F; Edwards S; Maxim J; Beeke S
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):220-39. PubMed ID: 23472961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Facilitator Behaviors Leading to Engagement and Disengagement in Aphasia Conversation Groups.
Lee JB; Azios JH
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 Feb; 29(1S):393-411. PubMed ID: 31419150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [A method of speech donorship and speech discourse for the speech restoration in aphasia].
Rudnev VA; Shteĭnerdt VV
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2012; 112(10):14-7. PubMed ID: 23250591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Therapeutic relationships in aphasia rehabilitation: Using sociological theories to promote critical reflexivity.
Bright F; Attrill S; Hersh D
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 Mar; 56(2):234-247. PubMed ID: 33369819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Practice style traits: do they help explain practice behaviours of stroke rehabilitation professionals?
Korner-Bitensky N; Menon-Nair A; Thomas A; Boutin E; Arafah AM
J Rehabil Med; 2007 Nov; 39(9):685-92. PubMed ID: 17999005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation.
Tempest S; McIntyre A
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 May; 28(10):663-7. PubMed ID: 16690581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Preferences for rehabilitation service delivery: a comparison of the views of patients, occupational therapists and other rehabilitation clinicians using a discrete choice experiment.
Laver K; Ratcliffe J; George S; Lester L; Crotty M
Aust Occup Ther J; 2013 Apr; 60(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 23551002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation.
Bright FA; Kayes NM; Worrall L; McPherson KM
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(8):643-54. PubMed ID: 24969698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia.
Dalemans RJ; de Witte L; Wade D; van den Heuvel W
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2010; 45(5):537-50. PubMed ID: 19839875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. What really matters to people with aphasia when it comes to group work? A qualitative investigation of factors impacting participation and integration.
Lanyon L; Worrall L; Rose M
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2018 May; 53(3):526-541. PubMed ID: 29349852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The knowledge and attitudes of occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech-language therapy students, regarding the speech-language therapist's role in the hospital stroke rehabilitation team.
Felsher L; Ross E
S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():49-63. PubMed ID: 8602543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Collaborative Goals for Communicative Life Participation in Aphasia: The FOURC Model.
Haley KL; Cunningham KT; Barry J; de Riesthal M
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Feb; 28(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 31072164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
