These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20958278)
1. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Teoh WH; Lee KM; Suhitharan T; Yahaya Z; Teo MM; Sia AT Anaesthesia; 2010 Dec; 65(12):1173-9. PubMed ID: 20958278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel. Gasteiger L; Brimacombe J; Perkhofer D; Kaufmann M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2010 Sep; 65(9):913-6. PubMed ID: 20645948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices. Ragazzi R; Finessi L; Farinelli I; Alvisi R; Volta CA Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insertion and use of the LMA Supreme in the prone position. López AM; Valero R; Brimacombe J Anaesthesia; 2010 Feb; 65(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 19930218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery]. Shi YB; Zuo MZ; Du XH; Yu Z Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized comparison of the i-gel(TM) with the LMA Supreme (TM) in anesthetized adult patients. Beleña JM; Núñez M; Vidal A; Gasco C; Alcojor A; Lee P; Pérez JL Anaesthesist; 2015 Apr; 64(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 25801488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. Francksen H; Bein B; Cavus E; Renner J; Scholz J; Steinfath M; Tonner PH; Doerges V Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16895620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Francksen H; Renner J; Hanss R; Scholz J; Doerges V; Bein B Anaesthesia; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 19735404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Theiler LG; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Kaiser D; Urwyler N; Luyet C; Vogt A; Greif R; Unibe MM Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Ali A; Canturk S; Turkmen A; Turgut N; Altan A Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1010-4. PubMed ID: 19707148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Abdi W; Amathieu R; Adhoum A; Poncelet C; Slavov V; Kamoun W; Combes X; Dhonneur G Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19681772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Cook TM; Gatward JJ; Handel J; Hardy R; Thompson C; Srivastava R; Clarke PA Anaesthesia; 2009 May; 64(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 19413827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Lee AK; Tey JB; Lim Y; Sia AT Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep; 37(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 19775047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery. Lopez AM; Agusti M; Gambus P; Pons M; Anglada T; Valero R J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27889843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Hohlrieder M; Brimacombe J; Eschertzhuber S; Ulmer H; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2007 Sep; 62(9):913-8. PubMed ID: 17697218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical comparison of the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask and the disposable Soft Seal mask in adult patients]. López AM; Valero R; Pons M; Salvador L; de Riva N; Gomar C Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2007 Oct; 54(8):462-8. PubMed ID: 17993094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions. Genzwuerker HV; Altmayer S; Hinkelbein J; Gernoth C; Viergutz T; Ocker H Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17944641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Beleña JM; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Núñez M; Lorenzo JA; de los Reyes A; Pérez JL; Yuste J J Clin Anesth; 2011 Sep; 23(6):456-60. PubMed ID: 21911191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]