These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20958307)
1. ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch. Forster B; Gillmeister H Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):788-96. PubMed ID: 20958307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions. Forster B; Sambo CF; Pavone EF Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 19665517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Object-guided spatial attention in touch: holding the same object with both hands delays attentional selection. Gillmeister H; Adler J; Forster B J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):931-42. PubMed ID: 19413480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule. Sambo CF; Forster B J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. Forster B; Eimer M Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15787854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing. Bolton DA; Staines WR Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials. Gherri E; Forster B Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind. Forster B; Eardley AF; Eimer M Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1131(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 17173872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task. Jones A; Forster B Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Links between eye movement preparation and the attentional processing of tactile events: an event-related brain potential study. Gherri E; Eimer M Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2587-97. PubMed ID: 18786857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Eimer M; Cockburn D; Smedley B; Driver J Exp Brain Res; 2001 Aug; 139(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 11534863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components. Eimer M; Forster B Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 114(7):1298-306. PubMed ID: 12842729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention. Eimer M; Forster B Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 12756516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The orienting of attention during eye and hand movements: ERP evidence for similar frame of reference but different spatially specific modulations of tactile processing. Gherri E; Forster B Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 22750676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]