153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20959261)
1. An efficient 3-D eddy-current solver using an independent impedance method for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
De Geeter N; Crevecoeur G; Dupre L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 20959261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D realistic head model simulation based on transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Yang S; Xu G; Wang L; Chen Y; Wu H; Li Y; Yang Q
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; Suppl():6469-72. PubMed ID: 17959428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A DTI-based model for TMS using the independent impedance method with frequency-dependent tissue parameters.
De Geeter N; Crevecoeur G; Dupré L; Van Hecke W; Leemans A
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(8):2169-88. PubMed ID: 22452983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical calculation of eddy currents in transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychiatric treatment.
Sekino M; Ueno S
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():88. PubMed ID: 16012627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High permeability cores to optimize the stimulation of deeply located brain regions using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Salvador R; Miranda PC; Roth Y; Zangen A
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3113-28. PubMed ID: 19420425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eddy current simulation in thick cylinders of finite length induced by coils of arbitrary geometry.
Sanchez Lopez H; Poole M; Crozier S
J Magn Reson; 2010 Dec; 207(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 20888278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method.
Nadeem M; Thorlin T; Gandhi OP; Persson M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 12848358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BRAIN initiative: fast and parallel solver for real-time monitoring of the eddy current in the brain for TMS applications.
Sabouni A; Pouliot P; Shmuel A; Lesage F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6250-3. PubMed ID: 25571425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of head and coil modeling for the calculation of induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Tachas NJ; Samaras T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23872490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new method for electric impedance imaging using an eddy current with a tetrapolar circuit.
Ahsan-Ul-Ambia ; Toda S; Takemae T; Kosugi Y; Hongo M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 19272885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Krylov subspace iterative techniques: on the detection of brain activity with electrical impedance tomography.
Polydorides N; Lionheart WR; McCann H
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 12166855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.
Wagner T; Fregni F; Fecteau S; Grodzinsky A; Zahn M; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1113-24. PubMed ID: 17337213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stroke: a computer-based human model study.
Wagner T; Fregni F; Eden U; Ramos-Estebanez C; Grodzinsky A; Zahn M; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):857-70. PubMed ID: 16473528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue: clinical impact on focality, reproducibility and true sham stimulation.
Toschi N; Welt T; Guerrisi M; Keck ME
J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Jan; 43(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 18514227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The numeric calculation of eddy current distributions in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Tsuyama S; Hyodo A; Sekino M; Hayami T; Ueno S; Iramina K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4286-9. PubMed ID: 19163660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An efficient impedance method for induced field evaluation based on a stabilized Bi-conjugate gradient algorithm.
Wang H; Liu F; Xia L; Crozier S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6363-75. PubMed ID: 18941281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the numerical accuracy of the impedance method.
Olree KS; Horch KW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep; 28(6):454-62. PubMed ID: 17486604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
