These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20959472)

  • 1. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of distinct kinase expression patterns in different subtypes of breast cancer.
    Bianchini G; Iwamoto T; Qi Y; Coutant C; Shiang CY; Wang B; Santarpia L; Valero V; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Gianni L; Pusztai L
    Cancer Res; 2010 Nov; 70(21):8852-62. PubMed ID: 20959472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of subtypes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2--positive breast cancer reveals a gene signature prognostic of outcome.
    Staaf J; Ringnér M; Vallon-Christersson J; Jönsson G; Bendahl PO; Holm K; Arason A; Gunnarsson H; Hegardt C; Agnarsson BA; Luts L; Grabau D; Fernö M; Malmström PO; Johannsson OT; Loman N; Barkardottir RB; Borg A
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1813-20. PubMed ID: 20231686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer?
    Nishimura R; Arima N
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 18369692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FOXA1 expression in breast cancer--correlation with luminal subtype A and survival.
    Badve S; Turbin D; Thorat MA; Morimiya A; Nielsen TO; Perou CM; Dunn S; Huntsman DG; Nakshatri H
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Aug; 13(15 Pt 1):4415-21. PubMed ID: 17671124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poor-prognosis estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer identified by histopathologic subclassification.
    Webster LR; Lee SF; Ringland C; Morey AL; Hanby AM; Morgan G; Byth K; Mote PA; Provan PJ; Ellis IO; Green AR; Lamoury G; Ravdin P; Clarke CL; Ward RL; Balleine RL; Hawkins NJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Oct; 14(20):6625-33. PubMed ID: 18927304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response.
    de Ronde JJ; Hannemann J; Halfwerk H; Mulder L; Straver ME; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Wesseling J; van de Vijver M; Wessels LF; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19669409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HER2 status in hormone receptor positive premenopausal primary breast cancer adds prognostic, but not tamoxifen treatment predictive, information.
    Rydén L; Landberg G; Stål O; Nordenskjöld B; Fernö M; Bendahl PO
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 May; 109(2):351-7. PubMed ID: 17636399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
    Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells according to immunohistochemically defined molecular subtypes in advanced breast cancer.
    Munzone E; Botteri E; Sandri MT; Esposito A; Adamoli L; Zorzino L; Sciandivasci A; Cassatella MC; Rotmensz N; Aurilio G; Curigliano G; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 12(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 23040002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for determining HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
    Kammori M; Kurabayashi R; Kashio M; Sakamoto A; Yoshimoto M; Amano S; Kaminishi M; Yamada T; Takubo K
    Oncol Rep; 2008 Mar; 19(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 18288397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinicopathological analyses of triple negative breast cancer using surveillance data from the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.
    Iwase H; Kurebayashi J; Tsuda H; Ohta T; Kurosumi M; Miyamoto K; Yamamoto Y; Iwase T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Apr; 17(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 19466512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes by quantitative assessment of biological parameters: relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, biological features and prognosis.
    Del Casar JM; Martín A; García C; Corte MD; Alvarez A; Junquera S; González LO; Bongera M; García-Muñiz JL; Allende MT; Vizoso F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18768247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Basal-HER2 phenotype shows poorer survival than basal-like phenotype in hormone receptor-negative invasive breast cancers.
    Liu H; Fan Q; Zhang Z; Li X; Yu H; Meng F
    Hum Pathol; 2008 Feb; 39(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 18045647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progression and treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
    Davoli A; Hocevar BA; Brown TL
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 65(4):611-23. PubMed ID: 20087739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status correlates with lymph node involvement in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative, but with grade in those with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer suitable for cytotoxic chemotherapy.
    Bartlett JM; Ellis IO; Dowsett M; Mallon EA; Cameron DA; Johnston S; Hall E; A'Hern R; Peckitt C; Bliss JM; Johnson L; Barrett-Lee P; Ellis P
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 25(28):4423-30. PubMed ID: 17906205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Ono M; Tsuda H; Shimizu C; Yamamoto S; Shibata T; Yamamoto H; Hirata T; Yonemori K; Ando M; Tamura K; Katsumata N; Kinoshita T; Takiguchi Y; Tanzawa H; Fujiwara Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(3):793-805. PubMed ID: 21562709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct p53 gene signatures are needed to predict prognosis and response to chemotherapy in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers.
    Coutant C; Rouzier R; Qi Y; Lehmann-Che J; Bianchini G; Iwamoto T; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Uzan S; Andre F; de Thé H; Pusztai L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Apr; 17(8):2591-601. PubMed ID: 21248301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expression of HER2 and estrogen receptor alpha depends upon nuclear localization of Y-box binding protein-1 in human breast cancers.
    Fujii T; Kawahara A; Basaki Y; Hattori S; Nakashima K; Nakano K; Shirouzu K; Kohno K; Yanagawa T; Yamana H; Nishio K; Ono M; Kuwano M; Kage M
    Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 68(5):1504-12. PubMed ID: 18316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.