These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20959540)

  • 1. Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality.
    Guimarães LS; Fletcher JG; Harmsen WS; Yu L; Siddiki H; Melton Z; Huprich JE; Hough D; Hartman R; McCollough CH
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):732-42. PubMed ID: 20959540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual unenhanced CT images acquired from dual-energy CT urography: accuracy of attenuation values and variation with contrast material phase.
    Sahni VA; Shinagare AB; Silverman SG
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 22974566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lowering kilovoltage to reduce radiation dose in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT: initial assessment of a prototype automated kilovoltage selection tool.
    Hough DM; Fletcher JG; Grant KL; Fidler JL; Yu L; Geske JR; Carter RE; Raupach R; Schmidt B; Flohr T; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1070-7. PubMed ID: 23096181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography for detection of various anatomic structures--effect on contrast enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality.
    Paul J; Bauer RW; Maentele W; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):612-9. PubMed ID: 21376494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; Kamath RS; Horiuchi T; Toth TL; Halpern EF; Saini S
    Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):241-9. PubMed ID: 15454622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in vascular and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT.
    Yu L; Fletcher JG; Grant KL; Carter RE; Hough DM; Barlow JM; Vrtiska TJ; Williamson EE; Young PM; Goss BC; Shiung M; Leng S; Raupach R; Schmidt B; Flohr T; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W297-306. PubMed ID: 23883244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of automated kilovoltage selection technology on contrast-enhanced pediatric CT and CT angiography.
    Siegel MJ; Hildebolt C; Bradley D
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 23564712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of image quality of low radiation dose abdominal CT by increasing contrast enhancement.
    Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Miyoshi T; Goshima S; Kondo H; Moriyama N; Bae KT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):986-92. PubMed ID: 20858829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.
    Nakayama Y; Awai K; Funama Y; Hatemura M; Imuta M; Nakaura T; Ryu D; Morishita S; Sultana S; Sato N; Yamashita Y
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):945-51. PubMed ID: 16237140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximizing Iodine Contrast-to-Noise Ratios in Abdominal CT Imaging through Use of Energy Domain Noise Reduction and Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT.
    Leng S; Yu L; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
    Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):562-70. PubMed ID: 25860839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tin-filter enhanced dual-energy-CT: image quality and accuracy of CT numbers in virtual noncontrast imaging.
    Kaufmann S; Sauter A; Spira D; Gatidis S; Ketelsen D; Heuschmid M; Claussen CD; Thomas C
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 23490736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Schindera ST; Graca P; Patak MA; Abderhalden S; von Allmen G; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT.
    Goske MJ; Strauss KJ; Coombs LP; Mandel KE; Towbin AJ; Larson DB; Callahan MJ; Darge K; Podberesky DJ; Frush DP; Westra SJ; Prince JS
    Radiology; 2013 Jul; 268(1):208-18. PubMed ID: 23513245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT of the pancreas: comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images.
    Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Nishibori H; Sakurai K; Miyazawa D; Watanabe H; Kondo H; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
    Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 21406629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
    Borgen L; Kalra MK; Laerum F; Hachette IW; Fredriksson CH; Sandborg M; Smedby O
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.